Multicast Performance Comparison of SMF and ODMRP Using the CONFINE Testbed

J. Kirchhoff, Julia Niewiejska, Christoph Fuchs, C. Barz, H. Rogge
{"title":"Multicast Performance Comparison of SMF and ODMRP Using the CONFINE Testbed","authors":"J. Kirchhoff, Julia Niewiejska, Christoph Fuchs, C. Barz, H. Rogge","doi":"10.1109/FiCloud.2015.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present preliminary results from a performance comparison between the two multicast routing protocols ODMRP and SMF. While SMF uses a proactive selection of forwarding nodes, ODMRP is a reactive approach to multicast routing. For the evaluation, we use an two-step approach. First, we perform emulation-based measurements in a virtualized test bed utilizing the ns-3 IEEE 802.11 model. Then, we do real-world experiments with an actual IEEE 802.11 ad-hoc test bed in order to compare the results and increase the overall credibility of our analysis. The comparison highlights differences in the performance of ODMRP and SMF, both in the real-world measurements and the emulation-based results. Our results show, that the scoped flooding approach of ODMRP might increase the applicability of multicast routing in community networks.","PeriodicalId":182204,"journal":{"name":"2015 3rd International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 3rd International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FiCloud.2015.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, we present preliminary results from a performance comparison between the two multicast routing protocols ODMRP and SMF. While SMF uses a proactive selection of forwarding nodes, ODMRP is a reactive approach to multicast routing. For the evaluation, we use an two-step approach. First, we perform emulation-based measurements in a virtualized test bed utilizing the ns-3 IEEE 802.11 model. Then, we do real-world experiments with an actual IEEE 802.11 ad-hoc test bed in order to compare the results and increase the overall credibility of our analysis. The comparison highlights differences in the performance of ODMRP and SMF, both in the real-world measurements and the emulation-based results. Our results show, that the scoped flooding approach of ODMRP might increase the applicability of multicast routing in community networks.
SMF和ODMRP组播性能的比较
在本文中,我们给出了两个组播路由协议ODMRP和SMF之间的性能比较的初步结果。SMF使用主动选择转发节点,而ODMRP是一种被动的多播路由方法。对于评估,我们使用两步方法。首先,我们利用ns-3 IEEE 802.11模型在虚拟化测试台上执行基于仿真的测量。然后,我们用实际的IEEE 802.11 ad-hoc测试平台进行了真实世界的实验,以便比较结果并增加我们分析的整体可信度。比较突出了ODMRP和SMF在实际测量和基于仿真的结果中的性能差异。研究结果表明,ODMRP的范围泛洪方法可以提高组播路由在社区网络中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信