Reduction between Aristotelian Modal Syllogisms Based on the Syllogism ◊I�A◊I-3

Cheng Zhang, Xiaojun Zhang
{"title":"Reduction between Aristotelian Modal Syllogisms Based on the Syllogism ◊I�A◊I-3","authors":"Cheng Zhang, Xiaojun Zhang","doi":"10.47363/jaicc/2023(2)112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to provide a consistent explanation for Aristotelian modal syllogistic, this paper reveals the reductions between the Aristotelian modal syllogism ◊I�A◊I-3 and the other valid modal syllogisms. Specifically, on the basis of formalizing Aristotelian modal syllogisms, this paper proves the validity of ◊I�A◊I-3 by means of the truth value definition of (modal) categorical propositions. Then in line with the symmetry of Aristotelian quantifiers some and no, the definition of inner and outer negations of Aristotelian quantifiers, and some rules in classical propositional logic, this paper deduces the other 47 valid Aristotelian modal syllogisms from the modal syllogism ◊I�A◊I-3. The reason why these syllogisms are reducible is that: (1) any of Aristotelian quantifier can be defined by the other three Aristotelian quantifiers; (2) the Aristotelian quantifiers some and no have symmetry; (3) the possible modality ◊ and necessary modality £ can be mutually defined. This formal study of Aristotelian modal syllogistic not only conforms to the needs of formalization transformation of various information in the era of artificial intelligence, but also provides a unified mathematical research paradigm for other kinds of syllogistic.","PeriodicalId":407351,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing","volume":"162 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47363/jaicc/2023(2)112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to provide a consistent explanation for Aristotelian modal syllogistic, this paper reveals the reductions between the Aristotelian modal syllogism ◊I�A◊I-3 and the other valid modal syllogisms. Specifically, on the basis of formalizing Aristotelian modal syllogisms, this paper proves the validity of ◊I�A◊I-3 by means of the truth value definition of (modal) categorical propositions. Then in line with the symmetry of Aristotelian quantifiers some and no, the definition of inner and outer negations of Aristotelian quantifiers, and some rules in classical propositional logic, this paper deduces the other 47 valid Aristotelian modal syllogisms from the modal syllogism ◊I�A◊I-3. The reason why these syllogisms are reducible is that: (1) any of Aristotelian quantifier can be defined by the other three Aristotelian quantifiers; (2) the Aristotelian quantifiers some and no have symmetry; (3) the possible modality ◊ and necessary modality £ can be mutually defined. This formal study of Aristotelian modal syllogistic not only conforms to the needs of formalization transformation of various information in the era of artificial intelligence, but also provides a unified mathematical research paradigm for other kinds of syllogistic.
基于三段论- I- A - I-3的亚里士多德模态三段论之间的约简
为了给亚里士多德模态三段论提供一个一致的解释,本文揭示了亚里士多德模态三段论- I- a - I-3与其他有效的模态三段论之间的约化。具体而言,本文在形式化亚里士多德模态三段论的基础上,利用(模态)直言命题的真值定义证明了- I- A - I-3的有效性。然后,根据亚里斯多德量词some和no的对称性、亚里斯多德量词内外否定的定义以及经典命题逻辑中的一些规则,从亚里斯多德模态三段论- I- A - I-3推导出了其他47个有效的亚里斯多德模态三段论。这些三段论是可约的原因是:(1)任何一个亚里士多德量词都可以被其他三个亚里士多德量词定义;(2)亚里士多德量词some和no具有对称性;(3)可能形态- - -和必要形态- - -可以相互界定。对亚里斯多德模态三段论的形式化研究,不仅符合人工智能时代各种信息形式化转换的需要,也为其他三段论提供了统一的数学研究范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信