The Essential Determinative of Man and Historical Materialism

Li Lianke
{"title":"The Essential Determinative of Man and Historical Materialism","authors":"Li Lianke","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-1467150499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article \"Is Man the Starting Point of Marxism?\" (published in Philosophical Studies, no. 3, 1983) Comrade Mao Chongjie remarked: \"The problem is not to what extent Marx emphasized man nor on how many occasions Marx mentioned man in his works. The problem is whether or not we should and how we could persevere in the materialist conception of history over the issue of man.\" Nevertheless, the author held that the cause for the progress of history lies \"outside man\" and therefore the source or cause of the essential determinative of man also lies \"outside man.\" Whatever the explanation, a viewpoint as such cannot be regarded as having \"persevered in the materialist conception of history,\" either. In fact, it can be traced to the same origin as the idea of negating practice as the basic category of historical materialism, which the author stated in another article. (See \"Also on the System of Marxist Philosophy,\" Xueshu yuekan [Academia Monthly], no. 2, 1983.)","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467150499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article "Is Man the Starting Point of Marxism?" (published in Philosophical Studies, no. 3, 1983) Comrade Mao Chongjie remarked: "The problem is not to what extent Marx emphasized man nor on how many occasions Marx mentioned man in his works. The problem is whether or not we should and how we could persevere in the materialist conception of history over the issue of man." Nevertheless, the author held that the cause for the progress of history lies "outside man" and therefore the source or cause of the essential determinative of man also lies "outside man." Whatever the explanation, a viewpoint as such cannot be regarded as having "persevered in the materialist conception of history," either. In fact, it can be traced to the same origin as the idea of negating practice as the basic category of historical materialism, which the author stated in another article. (See "Also on the System of Marxist Philosophy," Xueshu yuekan [Academia Monthly], no. 2, 1983.)
人的本质决定因素与历史唯物主义
在《人是马克思主义的出发点吗?》(发表于《哲学研究》第2期。(1983年3月3日)毛崇杰同志说:“问题不在于马克思在多大程度上强调人,也不在于马克思在他的著作中提到人多少次。问题是我们是否应该以及如何坚持唯物主义历史观来看待人的问题然而,作者认为,历史进步的原因在于“人之外”,因此人的本质决定因素的来源或原因也在于“人之外”。无论如何解释,这样的观点也不能被看作是“坚持唯物主义历史观”。事实上,它可以追溯到作为历史唯物主义基本范畴的否定实践的思想,这是作者在另一篇文章中所阐述的。(见《又论马克思主义哲学体系》,《学术月刊》第6期。2, 1983)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信