684 How to breaking bad news: an international survey among physicians and medical students in 1146 participants

J. Sehouli, A. Pirmorady, S. Boz, K. Hasan, K. Pietzner, E. Petru, V. Heinzelmann-Schwarz, E. Roser, D. Dimitrova, E. Herzog
{"title":"684 How to breaking bad news: an international survey among physicians and medical students in 1146 participants","authors":"J. Sehouli, A. Pirmorady, S. Boz, K. Hasan, K. Pietzner, E. Petru, V. Heinzelmann-Schwarz, E. Roser, D. Dimitrova, E. Herzog","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2021-esgo.313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"equity of care for ovarian cancer patients residing in Piedmont. This A&F is part of the activities of the EASY-NET network program (https://easy-net.info/). Methodology All consecutive patients treated for newly diagnosed EOC were included by 34 centres from May 2016 to September 2020. Clinical data were entered in a dedicated web database and data quality was centrally monitored. During the audit, 14 feedback meetings were organized with the participating centres to discuss data quality and preliminary results. The treating hospitals were classified according to the mean yearly volume of surgical activity ( 35; 34-18; <18 patients). Adherence to previously selected structure, process and outcome indicators were analysed by volume of activity of the centre and semester of enrolment. Adherence was classified as: high (>75%), medium (75-60%) and low (<60%). Overall survival (OS) was analysed with a multivariable Cox model including prognostic factors, hospital volume of activity and level of adherence to process indicators. Result(s)* The present analysis includes 905 patients with EOC diagnosed until December 2019 (23.4% early stages, 76.6% advanced). Out of 12 analysed indicators, 4 showed a high level of adherence (e.g., Completeness of diagnosis and staging: 83%), 3 a medium level (e.g., Adherence to surgical guidelines: 65.5%) and 5 a low level (e.g., Timing and number of cycles for NACT: 57.1%). In general, there was a lower adherence to guidelines by centres with a low volume of activity. For most of the indicators there was an improvement over time. Adherence to guidelines was associated to better OS after adjustment for prognostic factors. Conclusion* The A&F intervention was useful to support the identification of reference centres, to promote centralization, to reduce variability among regional hospitals and to increase the appropriateness of treatment. Adherence to guideline recommendations was associated to a better outcome. The EASY-NET project was funded by Ministry of Health and participating Regions (NET-2016-02364191).","PeriodicalId":253349,"journal":{"name":"Organization of gynaecological cancer care","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization of gynaecological cancer care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2021-esgo.313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

equity of care for ovarian cancer patients residing in Piedmont. This A&F is part of the activities of the EASY-NET network program (https://easy-net.info/). Methodology All consecutive patients treated for newly diagnosed EOC were included by 34 centres from May 2016 to September 2020. Clinical data were entered in a dedicated web database and data quality was centrally monitored. During the audit, 14 feedback meetings were organized with the participating centres to discuss data quality and preliminary results. The treating hospitals were classified according to the mean yearly volume of surgical activity ( 35; 34-18; <18 patients). Adherence to previously selected structure, process and outcome indicators were analysed by volume of activity of the centre and semester of enrolment. Adherence was classified as: high (>75%), medium (75-60%) and low (<60%). Overall survival (OS) was analysed with a multivariable Cox model including prognostic factors, hospital volume of activity and level of adherence to process indicators. Result(s)* The present analysis includes 905 patients with EOC diagnosed until December 2019 (23.4% early stages, 76.6% advanced). Out of 12 analysed indicators, 4 showed a high level of adherence (e.g., Completeness of diagnosis and staging: 83%), 3 a medium level (e.g., Adherence to surgical guidelines: 65.5%) and 5 a low level (e.g., Timing and number of cycles for NACT: 57.1%). In general, there was a lower adherence to guidelines by centres with a low volume of activity. For most of the indicators there was an improvement over time. Adherence to guidelines was associated to better OS after adjustment for prognostic factors. Conclusion* The A&F intervention was useful to support the identification of reference centres, to promote centralization, to reduce variability among regional hospitals and to increase the appropriateness of treatment. Adherence to guideline recommendations was associated to a better outcome. The EASY-NET project was funded by Ministry of Health and participating Regions (NET-2016-02364191).
684 .如何披露坏消息:对1146名医生和医科学生的国际调查
居住在皮埃蒙特的卵巢癌患者护理的公平性。这个A&F是EASY-NET网络项目(https://easy-net.info/)活动的一部分。方法纳入2016年5月至2020年9月34个中心连续接受新诊断EOC治疗的患者。临床数据被输入到一个专门的网络数据库中,数据质量被集中监控。在审计期间,与参与中心组织了14次反馈会议,讨论数据质量和初步结果。根据平均年手术活动量(35例;34-18;75%),中(75-60%)和低(<60%)。采用多变量Cox模型分析总生存期(OS),包括预后因素、医院活动量和对过程指标的依从性水平。*本分析包括截至2019年12月诊断的905例EOC患者(23.4%为早期,76.6%为晚期)。在分析的12项指标中,4项显示高水平的依从性(例如,诊断和分期的完整性:83%),3项显示中等水平(例如,对手术指南的依从性:65.5%),5项显示低水平(例如,NACT的时间和周期数:57.1%)。总的来说,活动量低的中心对指导方针的遵守程度较低。随着时间的推移,大多数指标都有所改善。在调整预后因素后,遵守指南与更好的OS相关。结论:A&F干预有助于确定参考中心,促进集中,减少区域医院之间的差异,提高治疗的适宜性。遵循指南建议与更好的结果相关。EASY-NET项目由卫生部及参与地区资助(NET-2016-02364191)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信