‘Oh, semiotics? Umberto Eco and stuff like that?’ Telling and constructing a discourse of marginality

E. Herrera
{"title":"‘Oh, semiotics? Umberto Eco and stuff like that?’ Telling and constructing a discourse of marginality","authors":"E. Herrera","doi":"10.2478/lf-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The current status of semiotics in society and the academic environment is rather marginal, and this is one of its many paradoxes (Gaines 2015). It is paradoxical because semiotics deals with all aspects of meaning; it is relevant to every field of inquiry (Posner et al. 2003) and is applicable to everyday experiences producing meaning. Yet, it is not an established field in most academic systems, and it lacks full recognition in the disciplinary ‘market’ (Rastier 2001). This paper discusses a particular aspect coming from a larger study carried out with 40 semiotics scholars in 12 countries in 3 languages (English, French and Spanish). I will focus on the construction and development of a prevailing discourse that intends to convey the practitioners’ own subjective experiences of living and working in a marginalised field.","PeriodicalId":354532,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Frontiers","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/lf-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The current status of semiotics in society and the academic environment is rather marginal, and this is one of its many paradoxes (Gaines 2015). It is paradoxical because semiotics deals with all aspects of meaning; it is relevant to every field of inquiry (Posner et al. 2003) and is applicable to everyday experiences producing meaning. Yet, it is not an established field in most academic systems, and it lacks full recognition in the disciplinary ‘market’ (Rastier 2001). This paper discusses a particular aspect coming from a larger study carried out with 40 semiotics scholars in 12 countries in 3 languages (English, French and Spanish). I will focus on the construction and development of a prevailing discourse that intends to convey the practitioners’ own subjective experiences of living and working in a marginalised field.
“哦,符号学?昂贝托·艾柯之类的?“讲述和构建一种边缘性话语
符号学在社会和学术环境中的现状是相当边缘化的,这是它的许多悖论之一(Gaines 2015)。这是矛盾的,因为符号学涉及意义的所有方面;它与每一个探究领域都相关(Posner et al. 2003),也适用于产生意义的日常体验。然而,在大多数学术体系中,它不是一个成熟的领域,并且在学科“市场”中缺乏充分的认可(Rastier 2001)。本文讨论了来自12个国家的40位符号学学者用3种语言(英语,法语和西班牙语)进行的一项更大的研究的一个特定方面。我将重点关注一种主流话语的构建和发展,这种话语旨在传达实践者在边缘化领域生活和工作的主观体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信