Potentials of mechatronic objects for improving mechatronic engineering: Results and insights from an online survey

Proceedings of 2012 IEEE 17th International Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA 2012) Pub Date : 2012-09-01 DOI:10.1109/ETFA.2012.6489666

Adrian Köhlein, B. Böhm, J. Elger, N. Gewald, F. Stallinger, R. Neumann, Reinhold Plösch, P. Hehenberger

{"title":"Potentials of mechatronic objects for improving mechatronic engineering: Results and insights from an online survey","authors":"Adrian Köhlein, B. Böhm, J. Elger, N. Gewald, F. Stallinger, R. Neumann, Reinhold Plösch, P. Hehenberger","doi":"10.1109/ETFA.2012.6489666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Industrial engineering is inherently of mechatronic character. The integration of all involved disciplines across the entire engineering life cycle is considered as a key element for improvements but requires appropriate conceptual support. Mechatronic objects provide such an approach. A criteria catalog for an assessment-based qualitative evaluation of respective engineering artifacts was developed, which aims to support characterizing, comparing, and improving mechatronic objects. In addition, it allows identifying directions for engineering improvements. In order to align future research efforts with industry needs, we conducted a survey among practitioners and researchers on their estimations regarding the potential of the mechatronic object concept and the implementation of selected criteria. This paper provides the results and insights from this survey and suggests a roadmap in order to improve mechatronic engineering.","PeriodicalId":222799,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 2012 IEEE 17th International Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA 2012)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 2012 IEEE 17th International Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA 2012)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2012.6489666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Industrial engineering is inherently of mechatronic character. The integration of all involved disciplines across the entire engineering life cycle is considered as a key element for improvements but requires appropriate conceptual support. Mechatronic objects provide such an approach. A criteria catalog for an assessment-based qualitative evaluation of respective engineering artifacts was developed, which aims to support characterizing, comparing, and improving mechatronic objects. In addition, it allows identifying directions for engineering improvements. In order to align future research efforts with industry needs, we conducted a survey among practitioners and researchers on their estimations regarding the potential of the mechatronic object concept and the implementation of selected criteria. This paper provides the results and insights from this survey and suggests a roadmap in order to improve mechatronic engineering.

查看原文本刊更多论文

机电一体化对象改善机电一体化工程的潜力:来自在线调查的结果和见解

工业工程本身具有机电一体化的特点。在整个工程生命周期中整合所有相关的学科被认为是改进的关键因素，但需要适当的概念支持。机电一体化对象提供了这样一种方法。为基于评估的各自工程工件的定性评估开发了一个标准目录，其目的是支持表征、比较和改进机电一体化对象。此外，它还可以确定工程改进的方向。为了使未来的研究工作与行业需求保持一致，我们在从业者和研究人员中进行了一项调查，了解他们对机电一体化对象概念的潜力和选定标准的实施的估计。本文提供了调查的结果和见解，并提出了改进机电一体化工程的路线图。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Proceedings of 2012 IEEE 17th International Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA 2012)

自引率

0.00%

发文量