Efficiency of root canal cleaning using a single instrument with reciprocating motion systems and full rotation systems: a SEM study

S. Živković, Jelena Neskovic, Milica Medojević, M. Bajić, Dejan Ostojić
{"title":"Efficiency of root canal cleaning using a single instrument with reciprocating motion systems and full rotation systems: a SEM study","authors":"S. Živković, Jelena Neskovic, Milica Medojević, M. Bajić, Dejan Ostojić","doi":"10.2478/sdj-2018-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Introduction Efficient cleaning and canal design present a basic precondition for successful endodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate, using SEM analysis, the efficacy of cleaning the apical third of the canal with one instrument in both reciprocating motion and full rotation systems. Materials and methods Thirty (30) single-rooted teeth (upper incisors), extracted due to periodontal reasons, were used and selected in 2 groups. In the group 1, instrumentation was done with a single instrument UNICONE with reciprocal movements (MEDIN, Czech Republic), while in the group 2, a single instrument XPS endo SHAPER (XPS) (FKG, Dentaire, Swiss) with full rotation was used. 2% solution of NaOCl and 17% EDTA solution were used as irrigation agents in both groups. SEM analysis of smear layer in the apical third was done at standard magnification of 1000x and presented on a scale of 1-5. Results showed mostly clean canal walls and no smear layer in the apical region in both tested groups. Canal walls were somewhat cleaner after using UNICONE with reciprocal movements (80%) compared to the canals instrumented with XPS ENDO SHAPER (76%), but this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion Single-file NiTi systems did not remove smear layer completely, but provided efficient cleaning in the apical part of the canal. UNICONE file with reciprocal movements was somewhat more efficient in removing smear layer compared to the full rotation XPS ENDO SHAPER file.","PeriodicalId":180624,"journal":{"name":"Serbian Dental Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serbian Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sdj-2018-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Summary Introduction Efficient cleaning and canal design present a basic precondition for successful endodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate, using SEM analysis, the efficacy of cleaning the apical third of the canal with one instrument in both reciprocating motion and full rotation systems. Materials and methods Thirty (30) single-rooted teeth (upper incisors), extracted due to periodontal reasons, were used and selected in 2 groups. In the group 1, instrumentation was done with a single instrument UNICONE with reciprocal movements (MEDIN, Czech Republic), while in the group 2, a single instrument XPS endo SHAPER (XPS) (FKG, Dentaire, Swiss) with full rotation was used. 2% solution of NaOCl and 17% EDTA solution were used as irrigation agents in both groups. SEM analysis of smear layer in the apical third was done at standard magnification of 1000x and presented on a scale of 1-5. Results showed mostly clean canal walls and no smear layer in the apical region in both tested groups. Canal walls were somewhat cleaner after using UNICONE with reciprocal movements (80%) compared to the canals instrumented with XPS ENDO SHAPER (76%), but this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion Single-file NiTi systems did not remove smear layer completely, but provided efficient cleaning in the apical part of the canal. UNICONE file with reciprocal movements was somewhat more efficient in removing smear layer compared to the full rotation XPS ENDO SHAPER file.
使用具有往复运动系统和全旋转系统的单一器械清洁根管的效率:扫描电镜研究
高效的清洁和根管设计是根管治疗成功的基本前提。本研究的目的是评估,使用扫描电镜分析,一个器械在往复运动和全旋转系统中清洁根尖三分之一的效果。材料与方法选择因牙周原因拔牙的单根牙(上切牙)30颗,分为两组。在第1组中,使用单器械UNICONE (MEDIN,捷克共和国)进行内固定,而在第2组中,使用单器械XPS endo SHAPER (XPS) (FKG, Dentaire,瑞士)进行全旋转。两组均采用2% NaOCl溶液和17% EDTA溶液作为灌洗剂。在标准放大率为1000倍的情况下,对根尖三分之一的涂片层进行扫描电镜分析,并按1-5分的比例呈现。结果显示,两组根管壁基本清洁,根尖区无脏污层。与使用XPS ENDO SHAPER(76%)的管壁相比,使用UNICONE进行反向运动后(80%)的管壁更清洁,但这种差异没有统计学意义。结论单锉NiTi系统不能完全清除涂片层,但能有效清洁根管根尖部分。与完全旋转的XPS ENDO SHAPER文件相比,具有相互运动的UNICONE文件在去除涂抹层方面更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信