Developing a new authenticity rating system on architectural conservation

M. Ulukan, H. Arslan
{"title":"Developing a new authenticity rating system on architectural conservation","authors":"M. Ulukan, H. Arslan","doi":"10.2495/SC121031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Authenticity is one of the main phenomena of architectural conservation. At first glance it refers to the emphasizing of fidelity, originality and sincerity to the origin of historic buildings, sites or objects. This notion is a common subject of argument in the interpretation of historic buildings and sites which involves experts of the architectural conservation council. Cognoscenti are bound to decide for the difficult resolution of authenticities of historic fabrics relating to their knowledge and experience. The question about the authenticity of a historic fabric can be answered whether it is authentic or not, but this does not give an idea about the level that is “how much”. The answer relies on the experts’ perceptions and while one may say “very good, authentic” the others may say “not authentic” for the same historic building. This shows a lack of clarity and certainty. In this study, a new ranking system has been developed to interpret the unequal results of deterioration of historic buildings and their authenticity levels by the use of “fuzzy logic” sets. A fuzzy logic model evaluates historic buildings according to the question of “how much”. Although numerical categorization sets forward sharp and mutually exclusive classes according to classical Aristotelian logic, “fuzzy logic” includes mutually inclusive classes. Fuzzy logic operators provide a formal method of manipulating linguistic variables. The usage of fuzzy logic in this system provides a comparative analysis of different conservation states of historic buildings to go through and accurate restoration works according to authenticity ratings. This study proposes objective decisions that can be interrogated and reconsidered on the authenticity of a monument rating model to evaluate the degree of authenticity of historic buildings and sites. This logical fuzzy model provides an easy tool to take reliable results. The model was briefly explained with working principles and formulations through","PeriodicalId":151288,"journal":{"name":"The Sustainable City VII","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Sustainable City VII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/SC121031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Authenticity is one of the main phenomena of architectural conservation. At first glance it refers to the emphasizing of fidelity, originality and sincerity to the origin of historic buildings, sites or objects. This notion is a common subject of argument in the interpretation of historic buildings and sites which involves experts of the architectural conservation council. Cognoscenti are bound to decide for the difficult resolution of authenticities of historic fabrics relating to their knowledge and experience. The question about the authenticity of a historic fabric can be answered whether it is authentic or not, but this does not give an idea about the level that is “how much”. The answer relies on the experts’ perceptions and while one may say “very good, authentic” the others may say “not authentic” for the same historic building. This shows a lack of clarity and certainty. In this study, a new ranking system has been developed to interpret the unequal results of deterioration of historic buildings and their authenticity levels by the use of “fuzzy logic” sets. A fuzzy logic model evaluates historic buildings according to the question of “how much”. Although numerical categorization sets forward sharp and mutually exclusive classes according to classical Aristotelian logic, “fuzzy logic” includes mutually inclusive classes. Fuzzy logic operators provide a formal method of manipulating linguistic variables. The usage of fuzzy logic in this system provides a comparative analysis of different conservation states of historic buildings to go through and accurate restoration works according to authenticity ratings. This study proposes objective decisions that can be interrogated and reconsidered on the authenticity of a monument rating model to evaluate the degree of authenticity of historic buildings and sites. This logical fuzzy model provides an easy tool to take reliable results. The model was briefly explained with working principles and formulations through
建立新的建筑保护真实性评价体系
真实性是建筑保护的主要现象之一。乍一看,它指的是强调对历史建筑、遗址或物体起源的忠实、原创性和真诚。在对历史建筑和遗址的解释中,这一概念是一个常见的争论主题,涉及建筑保护委员会的专家。行家们一定会根据他们的知识和经验来决定历史织物的真伪。关于历史织物的真实性的问题可以回答它是否真实,但这并没有给出“多少”的水平的概念。答案取决于专家的看法,对于同一座历史建筑,有人可能会说“非常好,真实”,而其他人可能会说“不真实”。这表明缺乏明确性和确定性。在本研究中,开发了一种新的排名系统,利用“模糊逻辑”集来解释历史建筑退化的不平等结果及其真实性水平。模糊逻辑模型根据“多少”的问题对历史建筑进行评价。数值范畴虽然根据古典亚里士多德逻辑提出尖锐的、互斥的类,但“模糊逻辑”却包含互斥的类。模糊逻辑算子提供了一种操作语言变量的形式化方法。该系统利用模糊逻辑对历史建筑的不同保护状态进行对比分析,并根据真实性等级进行精确修复。本研究提出了客观的决策,可以质疑和重新考虑古迹评级模型的真实性,以评估历史建筑和遗址的真实性程度。这个逻辑模糊模型提供了一个简单的工具来获得可靠的结果。简要说明了该模型的工作原理和公式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信