An empirical investigation of measures for well-being in highly automated vehicles

Vanessa Sauer, Alexander Mertens, V. Nitsch, J. Reuschel
{"title":"An empirical investigation of measures for well-being in highly automated vehicles","authors":"Vanessa Sauer, Alexander Mertens, V. Nitsch, J. Reuschel","doi":"10.1145/3349263.3351337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advent of automated driving shifts user behavior in vehicles and calls for user-centric design. One potential user-centric variable to consider is passenger well-being. In certain experimental designs and industry applications self-report measures may not be the optimal type of measurement and objective measures for well-being could give more nuanced results. This study investigates the relationship between subjective self-ratings and objective measures for well-being in the context of highly automated vehicles. A static driving simulator was used to create different vehicle interiors. Participants' (n=20) responses using self-reports and objective measures (i.e. heart rate variability, electrodermal activity, facial expression, body motion) were collected. The results showed significant correlations of self-reports with heart rate variability and body motion. Both measures were able to discriminate between different stimuli, suggesting that they may be suitable objective measures to act as proxy and complement subjective measures for well-being in highly automated vehicles.","PeriodicalId":237150,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The advent of automated driving shifts user behavior in vehicles and calls for user-centric design. One potential user-centric variable to consider is passenger well-being. In certain experimental designs and industry applications self-report measures may not be the optimal type of measurement and objective measures for well-being could give more nuanced results. This study investigates the relationship between subjective self-ratings and objective measures for well-being in the context of highly automated vehicles. A static driving simulator was used to create different vehicle interiors. Participants' (n=20) responses using self-reports and objective measures (i.e. heart rate variability, electrodermal activity, facial expression, body motion) were collected. The results showed significant correlations of self-reports with heart rate variability and body motion. Both measures were able to discriminate between different stimuli, suggesting that they may be suitable objective measures to act as proxy and complement subjective measures for well-being in highly automated vehicles.
对高度自动化车辆中幸福感指标的实证调查
自动驾驶的出现改变了用户在车辆中的行为,并要求以用户为中心的设计。需要考虑的一个以用户为中心的潜在变量是乘客的幸福感。在某些实验设计和行业应用中,自我报告测量可能不是最佳的测量类型,而幸福感的客观测量可能会给出更细微的结果。本研究探讨了在高度自动化车辆的背景下,主观自我评分和客观幸福感指标之间的关系。使用静态驾驶模拟器来创建不同的车辆内饰。使用自我报告和客观测量(即心率变异性、皮肤电活动、面部表情、身体运动)收集参与者(n=20)的反应。结果显示,自我报告与心率变异性和身体运动有显著的相关性。这两种测量方法都能够区分不同的刺激,这表明它们可能是合适的客观测量方法,可以作为高度自动化车辆幸福感的替代和补充主观测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信