KAJIAN FILSAFAT HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN PIDANA MATI MENURUT HAK AZASI MANUSIA

Jefri Efendi
{"title":"KAJIAN FILSAFAT HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN PIDANA MATI MENURUT HAK AZASI MANUSIA","authors":"Jefri Efendi","doi":"10.37303/magister.v12i1.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The provisions of article 10 of the Criminal Code (CRIMINAL CODE) state that in addition to 4 (four) main criminal types, namely: death penalty, imprisonment, imprisonment and fines, there are 3 (three) additional criminal types, namely the revocation of certain rights, confiscation of certain goods, and the announcement of the judge's decision. The death penalty is the most severe type of criminal in the composition of sanctions and is one of the main forms of criminal. The existence of the death penalty is basically a type of criminal that robs a legal interest (rechtsbelang), which is in the form of human life. The existence of the death penalty among jurists there is a difference of opinion. The formulation of the issue raised is how the execution procedure for death row inmates is viewed from the human rights side. The type of research used is normative juridical with a statutory approach. The results found that the death penalty has existed since antiquity through the regulation of positive laws, customary laws, and religion. The death penalty is a guarantee of recognition and respect for the right of freedom of others in fulfilling justice in accordance with moral considerations, religious values, security and public order. The death penalty in Indonesia is only applied to very serious crimes in accordance with applicable law.  The Constitution in addition to protecting human rights also allows such human rights to be restricted.    \nKeywords: Philosophy of law, death penalty, human rights.","PeriodicalId":441760,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif","volume":"4576 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37303/magister.v12i1.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The provisions of article 10 of the Criminal Code (CRIMINAL CODE) state that in addition to 4 (four) main criminal types, namely: death penalty, imprisonment, imprisonment and fines, there are 3 (three) additional criminal types, namely the revocation of certain rights, confiscation of certain goods, and the announcement of the judge's decision. The death penalty is the most severe type of criminal in the composition of sanctions and is one of the main forms of criminal. The existence of the death penalty is basically a type of criminal that robs a legal interest (rechtsbelang), which is in the form of human life. The existence of the death penalty among jurists there is a difference of opinion. The formulation of the issue raised is how the execution procedure for death row inmates is viewed from the human rights side. The type of research used is normative juridical with a statutory approach. The results found that the death penalty has existed since antiquity through the regulation of positive laws, customary laws, and religion. The death penalty is a guarantee of recognition and respect for the right of freedom of others in fulfilling justice in accordance with moral considerations, religious values, security and public order. The death penalty in Indonesia is only applied to very serious crimes in accordance with applicable law.  The Constitution in addition to protecting human rights also allows such human rights to be restricted.    Keywords: Philosophy of law, death penalty, human rights.
根据人权对死刑的法律哲学研究
《刑法》第10条规定,除死刑、监禁、监禁和罚款等4种主要刑事类型外,还有3种其他刑事类型,即撤销某些权利、没收某些物品和宣布法官的判决。死刑是制裁构成中最严厉的犯罪类型,是主要的犯罪形式之一。死刑的存在基本上是一种以人的生命为形式的剥夺法律利益的犯罪行为。对于是否存在死刑,法学家之间存在着意见分歧。所提问题的提法是如何从人权方面看待死囚的执行程序。所使用的研究类型是具有法定方法的规范性司法。结果发现,死刑自古以来就通过实在法、习惯法和宗教的规定而存在。死刑是在根据道德考虑、宗教价值观、安全和公共秩序履行正义时承认和尊重他人自由权利的一种保障。在印度尼西亚,根据适用法律,死刑只适用于非常严重的罪行。《宪法》除了保护人权之外,还允许限制这种人权。关键词:法哲学,死刑,人权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信