The Juridical Overview of the Sale of Owned Land on Joint Assets by Husband without Wife's Consent

Ary Patria Wisnu, Nanang Sri Darmadi, Andi Aina Ilmih
{"title":"The Juridical Overview of the Sale of Owned Land on Joint Assets by Husband without Wife's Consent","authors":"Ary Patria Wisnu, Nanang Sri Darmadi, Andi Aina Ilmih","doi":"10.30659/sanlar.4.2.465-476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to analyze: 1). The responsibility of the Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT) for the making of the Sale and Purchase Deed of the object of joint property transferred without the wife's approval based on Decision No. 253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN.Skt. 2). The legal consequences of the sale of land ownership rights to joint property by the husband without the wife's consent based on Decision No. 253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN.Skt. The approach method in this research is a normative juridical approach. The data used is secondary data obtained through literature study, data analysis was carried out by qualitative analysis. The results of the research concluded: 1). The responsibility of the Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT) for the making of the Sale and Purchase Deed of the object of joint property transferred without the wife's approval based on Decision No. 253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN. Skt is an absolute responsibility caused because in making the sale and purchase deed the PPAT was not careful and careful. As a result of decision No. 253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN.Skt is deed No. 112/ sale and purchase deed is contrary to the law, it will cause losses for the opposing party. PPAT must share responsibility for material losses suffered by the parties. 2). The legal consequences of the sale of land ownership rights to joint property by the husband without the wife's consent based on Decision No. 253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN.Skt is invalid and null and void. As a result, the Plaintiffs suffered material losses. So that in terms of legal certainty theory, this sale and purchase cannot provide legal certainty for the Buyer, so that the Opponent II and PPAT must be responsible for the unlawful acts they have committed.","PeriodicalId":279949,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.4.2.465-476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze: 1). The responsibility of the Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT) for the making of the Sale and Purchase Deed of the object of joint property transferred without the wife's approval based on Decision No. 253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN.Skt. 2). The legal consequences of the sale of land ownership rights to joint property by the husband without the wife's consent based on Decision No. 253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN.Skt. The approach method in this research is a normative juridical approach. The data used is secondary data obtained through literature study, data analysis was carried out by qualitative analysis. The results of the research concluded: 1). The responsibility of the Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT) for the making of the Sale and Purchase Deed of the object of joint property transferred without the wife's approval based on Decision No. 253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN. Skt is an absolute responsibility caused because in making the sale and purchase deed the PPAT was not careful and careful. As a result of decision No. 253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN.Skt is deed No. 112/ sale and purchase deed is contrary to the law, it will cause losses for the opposing party. PPAT must share responsibility for material losses suffered by the parties. 2). The legal consequences of the sale of land ownership rights to joint property by the husband without the wife's consent based on Decision No. 253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN.Skt is invalid and null and void. As a result, the Plaintiffs suffered material losses. So that in terms of legal certainty theory, this sale and purchase cannot provide legal certainty for the Buyer, so that the Opponent II and PPAT must be responsible for the unlawful acts they have committed.
丈夫未经妻子同意以共有财产出售自有土地的法律概述
本研究的目的是分析:1)根据第253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN.Skt号决定,在未经妻子同意的情况下,土地契约制作官(PPAT)对共同财产客体买卖契约的责任。2)根据第253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN.Skt号决定,丈夫未经妻子同意将土地所有权出售为共同财产的法律后果。本研究采用的方法是一种规范的法律方法。使用的数据是通过文献研究获得的二手数据,数据分析采用定性分析。研究结果表明:1)根据第253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN号决定,土地契约制作官(PPAT)在未经妻子同意的情况下,对共同财产的客体制作买卖契约的责任。Skt是由于PPAT在订立买卖契约时不谨慎而造成的绝对责任。根据第253/ pd . plw /2018/PN号决定。如果第112号买卖契约违反法律,将给对方造成损失。PPAT必须分担各方遭受的物质损失的责任。2)根据第253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN号决定,丈夫未经妻子同意将土地所有权出售为共同财产的法律后果。Skt无效且无效。因此,原告遭受了重大损失。因此,从法律确定性理论来看,此次买卖不能为买方提供法律确定性,因此对手II和PPAT必须对其所犯的非法行为负责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信