A Reexamination of Federal Regulation of the Insurance Industry

Martin Grace
{"title":"A Reexamination of Federal Regulation of the Insurance Industry","authors":"Martin Grace","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1350538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Optional Federal Chartering (OFC) proposal introduced in the last session of Congress may have been the right bill for the introduction of federal regulation of the insurance industry at the turn of the 20th century. However, the current OFC proposal shows its 19th century roots as it merely copies the banking industry’s dual chartering provision and various aspects of state insurance regulatory law. This paper critiques the issue of federal regulation, not necessarily from the perspective of whether federal regulation dominates state regulation, but as to whether the federal or state regulation is structured sufficiently to minimize market failures or to minimize the effect of regulatory failures.","PeriodicalId":315176,"journal":{"name":"Banking & Insurance","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banking & Insurance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1350538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The Optional Federal Chartering (OFC) proposal introduced in the last session of Congress may have been the right bill for the introduction of federal regulation of the insurance industry at the turn of the 20th century. However, the current OFC proposal shows its 19th century roots as it merely copies the banking industry’s dual chartering provision and various aspects of state insurance regulatory law. This paper critiques the issue of federal regulation, not necessarily from the perspective of whether federal regulation dominates state regulation, but as to whether the federal or state regulation is structured sufficiently to minimize market failures or to minimize the effect of regulatory failures.
对保险业联邦监管的重新审视
在上一届国会会议上提出的可选联邦特许(OFC)提案可能是在20世纪之交引入联邦对保险业监管的正确法案。然而,目前的OFC提案显示出其19世纪的根源,因为它只是复制了银行业的双重特许规定和国家保险监管法律的各个方面。本文对联邦监管问题的批评,不一定是从联邦监管是否主导州监管的角度出发,而是从联邦或州监管的结构是否足以最小化市场失灵或最小化监管失灵的影响的角度出发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信