A temporal approach to communicating relationship styles in romantic relationships

R. Lloyd
{"title":"A temporal approach to communicating relationship styles in romantic relationships","authors":"R. Lloyd","doi":"10.1080/17459435.2020.1737189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated how a trichotomy of relationships styles—self-focused autonomy, other-focused connection, and mutuality (Harter et al., 1997) are communicated in romantic relationships through seven temporal enactments of time—linearity, pace, punctuality, delay, separation, scheduling, and flexibility (Ballard & Seibold, 2004). Twenty in-depth interviews with New Zealand college students indicated that individuals experience all seven enactments of time in their romantic relationships when attempting to find a balance between interdependent desires of autonomy and connection. Results revealed that people integrated most temporal dimensions with multiple relationship styles; however, some temporal enactments tended to exhibit more singularity towards specific relationship styles. Participants used self-focused autonomy to describe performances of linearity, pace, and delay in their relationships. Mutuality was most commonly represented in terms of scheduling and flexibility. Findings also identified two relationship styles (i.e., other-focused autonomy and self-focused connection) not mentioned by extant literature. Other-focused autonomy was portrayed by individuals to create a sense of independence from their partner despite a desire to interact. The second new relationship style that emerged was self-focused connection. Participants described using deception and urgent excuses to get their partner’s physical presence, when their partner communicated that they wanted more time apart. This paper is the first step toward understanding the complex relationship between temporality, relationships styles, and interpersonal communication.","PeriodicalId":406864,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2020.1737189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study investigated how a trichotomy of relationships styles—self-focused autonomy, other-focused connection, and mutuality (Harter et al., 1997) are communicated in romantic relationships through seven temporal enactments of time—linearity, pace, punctuality, delay, separation, scheduling, and flexibility (Ballard & Seibold, 2004). Twenty in-depth interviews with New Zealand college students indicated that individuals experience all seven enactments of time in their romantic relationships when attempting to find a balance between interdependent desires of autonomy and connection. Results revealed that people integrated most temporal dimensions with multiple relationship styles; however, some temporal enactments tended to exhibit more singularity towards specific relationship styles. Participants used self-focused autonomy to describe performances of linearity, pace, and delay in their relationships. Mutuality was most commonly represented in terms of scheduling and flexibility. Findings also identified two relationship styles (i.e., other-focused autonomy and self-focused connection) not mentioned by extant literature. Other-focused autonomy was portrayed by individuals to create a sense of independence from their partner despite a desire to interact. The second new relationship style that emerged was self-focused connection. Participants described using deception and urgent excuses to get their partner’s physical presence, when their partner communicated that they wanted more time apart. This paper is the first step toward understanding the complex relationship between temporality, relationships styles, and interpersonal communication.
在浪漫关系中交流关系风格的时间方法
本研究调查了恋爱关系的三分法——自我关注的自主性、他人关注的联系和相互性(Harter et al., 1997)是如何通过时间线性、节奏、准时性、延迟、分离、调度和灵活性(Ballard & Seibold, 2004)这七种时间因素在恋爱关系中传达的。对新西兰大学生的20次深度访谈表明,当人们试图在自主和联系的相互依赖的欲望之间找到平衡时,他们会在恋爱关系中经历所有7种时间的变化。结果表明,人们将大多数时间维度与多种关系类型整合在一起;然而,一些时间法规倾向于对特定的关系风格表现出更多的独特性。参与者用自我关注的自主性来描述他们关系中的线性、节奏和延迟的表现。互动性最常体现在日程安排和灵活性方面。研究结果还确定了两种现有文献未提及的关系类型(即以他人为中心的自治和以自我为中心的联系)。以他人为中心的自主性被个人描述为在渴望互动的情况下,创造一种独立于伴侣的感觉。出现的第二种新型关系是自我关注型关系。参与者描述了当他们的伴侣表示他们想要更多的时间分开时,他们会用欺骗和紧急的借口让伴侣出现在他们身边。本文是理解时间性、人际关系风格和人际沟通之间复杂关系的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信