Dynamic compression plating with interlocking nailing for fracture shaft of humerus in adult: A prospective study

Arvind Kumar
{"title":"Dynamic compression plating with interlocking nailing for fracture shaft of humerus in adult: A prospective study","authors":"Arvind Kumar","doi":"10.26611/10202132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In orthopaedics, a humerus fracture is a frequent yet difficult to treat problem. Unless complicated, these are normally treated non-operatively (with a hanging arm cast, U cast, or U slab). Complete union is not always required since the bone has a dense covering of muscles and blood vessels. The goal of this study was to see if there was a difference between dynamic compression plating (DCP) and intramedullary interlocking nailing in diaphyseal humeral fractures in adults. Methods: It was a prospective study undertaken at MGM Medical College and L.S.K. Hospital in Kishanganj, Bihar, in the department of orthopaedics. During the study period of November 2020 to September 2021, a total of 40 cases were enrolled. The participants in the study were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One closed reduction and internal fixation with antegrade intramedullary interlocking nail-group, and one open reduction and internal fixation with dynamic compression plating-group. Results: We found that the final outcome in between the groups, comparison of DASH score, maximum number of excellent cases were Dynamic compression plating group. i.e. 80.0%, good-13.3%, Fair was 6.7% respectively. In another Interlocking nailing group excellent cases were found 26.7%, good-33.3%, fair- 26.7% and poor was 13.3% respectively. We have found statistically significant p value -0.028. Conclusion: There appears to be a substantial difference in radiological union or rate of union between the two groups; nonetheless, based on complications and functional results, Dynamic compression plating is a good fixation method","PeriodicalId":126695,"journal":{"name":"MedPulse International Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedPulse International Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26611/10202132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In orthopaedics, a humerus fracture is a frequent yet difficult to treat problem. Unless complicated, these are normally treated non-operatively (with a hanging arm cast, U cast, or U slab). Complete union is not always required since the bone has a dense covering of muscles and blood vessels. The goal of this study was to see if there was a difference between dynamic compression plating (DCP) and intramedullary interlocking nailing in diaphyseal humeral fractures in adults. Methods: It was a prospective study undertaken at MGM Medical College and L.S.K. Hospital in Kishanganj, Bihar, in the department of orthopaedics. During the study period of November 2020 to September 2021, a total of 40 cases were enrolled. The participants in the study were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One closed reduction and internal fixation with antegrade intramedullary interlocking nail-group, and one open reduction and internal fixation with dynamic compression plating-group. Results: We found that the final outcome in between the groups, comparison of DASH score, maximum number of excellent cases were Dynamic compression plating group. i.e. 80.0%, good-13.3%, Fair was 6.7% respectively. In another Interlocking nailing group excellent cases were found 26.7%, good-33.3%, fair- 26.7% and poor was 13.3% respectively. We have found statistically significant p value -0.028. Conclusion: There appears to be a substantial difference in radiological union or rate of union between the two groups; nonetheless, based on complications and functional results, Dynamic compression plating is a good fixation method
动态加压钢板联锁钉治疗成人肱骨骨折:一项前瞻性研究
背景:在骨科中,肱骨骨折是一个常见而又难以治疗的问题。除非病情复杂,否则通常采用非手术治疗(吊臂石膏、U型石膏或U型板)。由于骨骼有一层致密的肌肉和血管覆盖,因此并不总是需要完全愈合。本研究的目的是观察在成人肱骨骨干骨折中,动态加压钢板(DCP)和髓内交锁钉治疗是否存在差异。方法:在比哈尔邦基尚甘杰市米高梅医学院和L.S.K.医院骨科进行前瞻性研究。研究期间为2020年11月至2021年9月,共入组病例40例。研究参与者被随机分为两组。顺行交锁髓内钉组闭合复位内固定1例,动力加压钢板组开放复位内固定1例。结果:我们发现在两组间的最终疗效、DASH评分比较中,优病例数最多的是动态加压钢板组。即80.0%,good-13.3%, Fair分别为6.7%。交锁钉组优者26.7%,良者33.3%,一般者26.7%,差者13.3%。我们发现p值有统计学意义-0.028。结论:两组在放射愈合或愈合率上存在显著差异;然而,基于并发症和功能结果,动态加压钢板是一种很好的固定方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信