Contact Angle Measurement Methods for Soft Contact Lens Wettability

Hyosun Kim, B. Ha, Seong-Ryul Lee, K. Kim
{"title":"Contact Angle Measurement Methods for Soft Contact Lens Wettability","authors":"Hyosun Kim, B. Ha, Seong-Ryul Lee, K. Kim","doi":"10.14479/jkoos.2023.28.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study investigated a suitable contact angle measurement method for evaluating wettability in soft contact lenses. Methods : Based on the method of measuring the contact angle of RGP contact lenses specified in the ANSI Z80.20-2004 standard, the contact angle between the RGP lens and the soft contact lens was compared and analyzed through the sessile drop and captive bubble methods. In addition, the suitable contact angle measurement method for soft contact lenses were confirmed by comparing the contact angle changes over time and the measurement results distribution. Results : In the RGP lens, the contact angle measured by the captive bubble method was lower than that measured by the sessile drop method. In the soft contact lens, the contact angle measured by the captive bubble method was lower than that of the sessile drop method in the same way as the RGP contact lens. The sessile drop method was more affected by external influences than the captive bubble method. Conclusions : As for the wettability measurement method of soft contact lenses, the captive bubble method, less affected by external factors like the RGP lenses, is considered more accurate than the sessile drop method.","PeriodicalId":178533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2023.28.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated a suitable contact angle measurement method for evaluating wettability in soft contact lenses. Methods : Based on the method of measuring the contact angle of RGP contact lenses specified in the ANSI Z80.20-2004 standard, the contact angle between the RGP lens and the soft contact lens was compared and analyzed through the sessile drop and captive bubble methods. In addition, the suitable contact angle measurement method for soft contact lenses were confirmed by comparing the contact angle changes over time and the measurement results distribution. Results : In the RGP lens, the contact angle measured by the captive bubble method was lower than that measured by the sessile drop method. In the soft contact lens, the contact angle measured by the captive bubble method was lower than that of the sessile drop method in the same way as the RGP contact lens. The sessile drop method was more affected by external influences than the captive bubble method. Conclusions : As for the wettability measurement method of soft contact lenses, the captive bubble method, less affected by external factors like the RGP lenses, is considered more accurate than the sessile drop method.
软性隐形眼镜润湿性的接触角测量方法
目的:探讨软性隐形眼镜润湿性的接触角测量方法。方法:根据ANSI Z80.20-2004标准规定的RGP隐形眼镜接触角的测量方法,通过固滴法和俘获泡法对RGP隐形眼镜与软性隐形眼镜的接触角进行比较分析。此外,通过对比接触角随时间的变化和测量结果的分布,确定了适合软性隐形眼镜的接触角测量方法。结果:在RGP晶体中,俘获泡法测得的接触角比固滴法测得的接触角小。在软性隐形眼镜中,与RGP隐形眼镜相同,俘获泡法测得的接触角比固滴法测得的接触角要低。固滴法受外界影响比俘获泡法更大。结论:对于软性隐形眼镜的润湿性测量方法,俘获泡法受RGP镜片等外界因素影响较小,被认为比固滴法更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信