Performance evaluation of detour path selection scheme for MPLS traffic engineering

H. Tamura, K. Yuasa, K. Kawahara, Y. Oie
{"title":"Performance evaluation of detour path selection scheme for MPLS traffic engineering","authors":"H. Tamura, K. Yuasa, K. Kawahara, Y. Oie","doi":"10.1109/PACRIM.2005.1517237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-protocol label switching (MPLS) allows several detour paths (label switched paths, LSPs) to be (pre-) established for some source-destination pair as well as its primary path of minimum hops. Thus, we should specify how to allocate an arrival flow to these two kinds of paths for effective traffic engineering (TE). So far, we have proposed and analytically evaluated the two-phase path management scheme with the random detour path selection in order to allocate an arrival flow to one of these paths for MPLS-TE. In this paper, we propose two more detour path selection schemes, namely, fixed detour path selection and least-loaded detour path selection, and compare the performance of the detour path selection schemes. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of the load imbalance on TE performance of our proposed scheme with the least-loaded detour path selection.","PeriodicalId":346880,"journal":{"name":"PACRIM. 2005 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and signal Processing, 2005.","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PACRIM. 2005 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and signal Processing, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PACRIM.2005.1517237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Multi-protocol label switching (MPLS) allows several detour paths (label switched paths, LSPs) to be (pre-) established for some source-destination pair as well as its primary path of minimum hops. Thus, we should specify how to allocate an arrival flow to these two kinds of paths for effective traffic engineering (TE). So far, we have proposed and analytically evaluated the two-phase path management scheme with the random detour path selection in order to allocate an arrival flow to one of these paths for MPLS-TE. In this paper, we propose two more detour path selection schemes, namely, fixed detour path selection and least-loaded detour path selection, and compare the performance of the detour path selection schemes. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of the load imbalance on TE performance of our proposed scheme with the least-loaded detour path selection.
MPLS流量工程绕行路径选择方案的性能评价
MPLS (Multi-protocol label switching)允许为某些源-目的对(source-destination pair)(预先)建立多条绕行路径(label switched paths, lsp)以及最小跳数的主路径。因此,我们应该明确如何将到达流分配给这两种路径,以实现有效的交通工程(TE)。到目前为止,我们已经提出并分析评估了随机迂回路径选择的两相路径管理方案,以便将到达流分配到MPLS-TE的其中一条路径上。在本文中,我们又提出了两种绕行路径选择方案,即固定绕行路径选择和最小负载绕行路径选择,并比较了两种绕行路径选择方案的性能。此外,我们研究了负载不平衡对我们提出的最小负载绕行路径选择方案的TE性能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信