Study for fusion of different sources to determine relevance

Chi-Hung Chi, Chen Ding, Kwok-Yan Lam
{"title":"Study for fusion of different sources to determine relevance","authors":"Chi-Hung Chi, Chen Ding, Kwok-Yan Lam","doi":"10.1109/TAI.2002.1180846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of a Web document could be measured not only by its text content, but also by some other factors such as the link connectivity and usage patterns. In previous data fusion researches, the text is the only source to determine the relevance, and only the different runs (e.g. by different retrieval models, different query or document representations) on this same source are combined. It is the purpose of this paper to investigate whether the different sources can be combined to determine the relevance with a better accuracy than any single source. We conducted a preliminary experiment to test its feasibility and effectiveness and a positive result was obtained.","PeriodicalId":197064,"journal":{"name":"14th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 2002. (ICTAI 2002). Proceedings.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"14th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 2002. (ICTAI 2002). Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.2002.1180846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The relevance of a Web document could be measured not only by its text content, but also by some other factors such as the link connectivity and usage patterns. In previous data fusion researches, the text is the only source to determine the relevance, and only the different runs (e.g. by different retrieval models, different query or document representations) on this same source are combined. It is the purpose of this paper to investigate whether the different sources can be combined to determine the relevance with a better accuracy than any single source. We conducted a preliminary experiment to test its feasibility and effectiveness and a positive result was obtained.
研究不同来源的融合,以确定相关性
Web文档的相关性不仅可以通过其文本内容来衡量,还可以通过一些其他因素(如链接连接性和使用模式)来衡量。在以往的数据融合研究中,文本是确定相关性的唯一来源,并且只组合同一来源上的不同运行(例如通过不同的检索模型,不同的查询或文档表示)。本文的目的是研究是否可以将不同的来源组合起来以确定相关性,并且比任何单一来源的准确性更好。我们进行了初步实验,验证了其可行性和有效性,并取得了积极的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信