Do Fit Opinions Matter? The Impact of Fit Context on Online Product Returns

Yang Wang, V. Ramachandran, O. Sheng
{"title":"Do Fit Opinions Matter? The Impact of Fit Context on Online Product Returns","authors":"Yang Wang, V. Ramachandran, O. Sheng","doi":"10.1287/ISRE.2020.0965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Product fit uncertainty is cited as one of the top reasons for high online product return rates. Fit describes how well a product suits a consumer’s needs. The value of a product drops sharply when it deviates from a customer’s ideal fit. In this study, we focus on ordinal fit, a type of fit attribute that can be ordered on a scale, e.g. the size of apparel, and the difficulty level of courses. By leveraging a change in the product review system at an online retailer, we examine the impacts of two types of fit information – fit valence (an overall evaluation of a product’s ordinal-fit attribute) and fit reference (a reviewer’s ordinal-fit attribute and her choice of the product’s fit attribute) – on returns of apparel goods. Using the lens of advice-taking, we reveal the important role of the context of fit opinions (i.e. fit reference) in facilitating shoppers to better interpret fit valence by enabling effective ordinal-fit adjustment and, consequently, reducing product returns. \n \nWe employ a predictive analytics framework for counterfactual prediction via the Generalized Synthetic Control method to address endogeneity issues and shed light on the dynamic treatment effect. Our findings indicate that fit valence alone can lower product returns only in a limited situation – when the majority of reviewers agree on the fit valence. In other cases – when either the fit valences are inconsistent or far and few between, it is the combination of fit valence and fit reference that lowers product returns. With the availability of both types of fit information, similar reviewers play an important role in helping improve the accuracy in ordinal-fit adjustments. Yet, albeit less effective, information from reviewers with dissimilar body sizes can also help make useful ordinal-fit adjustments. Besides, shoppers appear to benefit from both positive and negative fit valences, as long as they are aided by fit reference. Our empirical insights are relevant to many situations where ordinal-fit attributes dominate consumers’ product evaluation process. Accordingly, we provide useful implications for online sellers grappling with high product return rates.","PeriodicalId":370988,"journal":{"name":"eBusiness & eCommerce eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eBusiness & eCommerce eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/ISRE.2020.0965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Product fit uncertainty is cited as one of the top reasons for high online product return rates. Fit describes how well a product suits a consumer’s needs. The value of a product drops sharply when it deviates from a customer’s ideal fit. In this study, we focus on ordinal fit, a type of fit attribute that can be ordered on a scale, e.g. the size of apparel, and the difficulty level of courses. By leveraging a change in the product review system at an online retailer, we examine the impacts of two types of fit information – fit valence (an overall evaluation of a product’s ordinal-fit attribute) and fit reference (a reviewer’s ordinal-fit attribute and her choice of the product’s fit attribute) – on returns of apparel goods. Using the lens of advice-taking, we reveal the important role of the context of fit opinions (i.e. fit reference) in facilitating shoppers to better interpret fit valence by enabling effective ordinal-fit adjustment and, consequently, reducing product returns. We employ a predictive analytics framework for counterfactual prediction via the Generalized Synthetic Control method to address endogeneity issues and shed light on the dynamic treatment effect. Our findings indicate that fit valence alone can lower product returns only in a limited situation – when the majority of reviewers agree on the fit valence. In other cases – when either the fit valences are inconsistent or far and few between, it is the combination of fit valence and fit reference that lowers product returns. With the availability of both types of fit information, similar reviewers play an important role in helping improve the accuracy in ordinal-fit adjustments. Yet, albeit less effective, information from reviewers with dissimilar body sizes can also help make useful ordinal-fit adjustments. Besides, shoppers appear to benefit from both positive and negative fit valences, as long as they are aided by fit reference. Our empirical insights are relevant to many situations where ordinal-fit attributes dominate consumers’ product evaluation process. Accordingly, we provide useful implications for online sellers grappling with high product return rates.
合适的意见重要吗?契合情境对在线产品退货的影响
产品匹配的不确定性被认为是高在线产品退货率的主要原因之一。适合度描述的是产品适合消费者需求的程度。当产品偏离顾客的理想契合度时,它的价值就会急剧下降。在本研究中,我们关注的是有序契合,这是一种可以在尺度上排序的契合属性,例如服装的大小和课程的难度。通过利用在线零售商产品评论系统的变化,我们研究了两种类型的适合信息-适合价(对产品顺序适合属性的总体评价)和适合参考(评论者的顺序适合属性和她对产品适合属性的选择)对服装退货的影响。通过采纳建议的视角,我们揭示了适合意见的语境(即适合参考)在促进购物者通过有效的有序适合调整来更好地解释适合价,从而减少产品退货方面的重要作用。我们采用预测分析框架,通过广义综合控制方法进行反事实预测,以解决内生性问题,并阐明动态处理效果。我们的研究结果表明,仅在有限的情况下,当大多数评论者同意契合价时,适合价才能降低产品退货。在其他情况下,当匹配价不一致或相差甚远时,是匹配价和匹配参考的组合降低了产品退货。由于两种类型的拟合信息的可用性,相似的评论者在帮助提高序拟合调整的准确性方面发挥了重要作用。然而,尽管效果不太好,来自不同体型的审稿人的信息也可以帮助进行有用的有序匹配调整。此外,购物者似乎从积极和消极的适合价中受益,只要他们有合适的参考。我们的经验见解是相关的许多情况下,序拟合属性主导消费者的产品评价过程。因此,我们为在线卖家提供了有用的启示,以应对高产品退货率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信