‘Co-operation without Incorporation’: Dissenting Relations after the Disruption

Ryan Mallon
{"title":"‘Co-operation without Incorporation’: Dissenting Relations after the Disruption","authors":"Ryan Mallon","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474482790.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the Free Church’s scathing criticism of the perceived failures of voluntaryism, the immediate aftermath of the Disruption witnessed a thawing of relations between Scotland’s dissenting Presbyterians after the acrimony of the Voluntary Controversy. This chapter will assess the policy of ‘co-operation of incorporation’ that developed as Scotland’s dissenting churches grew closer after 1843. Inspired by the 1843 Bicentenary of the Westminster Assembly, and recognising the shared principles and ecclesiology of Scotland’s various non-established Presbyterian denominations, ‘co-operation without incorporation’ suggested a loose and ambiguous dissenting coalition, deemed necessary to tackle Scotland’s social and moral ills, while also challenging the hegemony of the National Church, the shared enemy for Scottish dissenters. This chapter assesses the often fraught means through which this policy was enacted, including pulpit sharing, meetings, and co-operation in the formation of the major pan-Protestant organisation of the period, the Evangelical Alliance. Though it provoked a mixed reaction from members of both churches, the desire to enact real and lasting union between evangelicals through the early days of the Evangelical Alliance would influence ‘the age of unions’ that followed within Scottish dissent.","PeriodicalId":227963,"journal":{"name":"Dissent After Disruption","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dissent After Disruption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474482790.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the Free Church’s scathing criticism of the perceived failures of voluntaryism, the immediate aftermath of the Disruption witnessed a thawing of relations between Scotland’s dissenting Presbyterians after the acrimony of the Voluntary Controversy. This chapter will assess the policy of ‘co-operation of incorporation’ that developed as Scotland’s dissenting churches grew closer after 1843. Inspired by the 1843 Bicentenary of the Westminster Assembly, and recognising the shared principles and ecclesiology of Scotland’s various non-established Presbyterian denominations, ‘co-operation without incorporation’ suggested a loose and ambiguous dissenting coalition, deemed necessary to tackle Scotland’s social and moral ills, while also challenging the hegemony of the National Church, the shared enemy for Scottish dissenters. This chapter assesses the often fraught means through which this policy was enacted, including pulpit sharing, meetings, and co-operation in the formation of the major pan-Protestant organisation of the period, the Evangelical Alliance. Though it provoked a mixed reaction from members of both churches, the desire to enact real and lasting union between evangelicals through the early days of the Evangelical Alliance would influence ‘the age of unions’ that followed within Scottish dissent.
“不合并的合作”:分裂后的不同关系
尽管自由教会对自愿主义的失败进行了严厉的批评,但在自愿争议之后,分裂的直接后果见证了苏格兰持不同意见的长老会之间的关系解冻。本章将评估“合并合作”的政策,该政策在1843年后随着苏格兰不同教派的教会越来越紧密而发展。受1843年威斯敏斯特议会200周年纪念的启发,并认识到苏格兰各种非建立的长老会教派的共同原则和教会教义,“合作而不合并”表明了一个松散而模糊的反对联盟,被认为是解决苏格兰社会和道德弊病的必要条件,同时也挑战了国家教会的霸权,苏格兰反对者的共同敌人。本章评估了这一政策制定过程中经常出现的令人担忧的手段,包括讲坛共享、会议和合作,形成了这一时期主要的泛新教组织——福音派联盟。虽然这引起了两派成员的不同反应,但早期福音派联盟希望在福音派之间建立真正持久的联盟,这影响了随后苏格兰异见人士的"联盟时代"
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信