DRM Interoperability and Intellectual Property Policy in Europe

M. Valimaki, V. Oksanen
{"title":"DRM Interoperability and Intellectual Property Policy in Europe","authors":"M. Valimaki, V. Oksanen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1261643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Apple's dominating music downloading service iTunes Music Store has brought interoperability debate once again on the table. To be sure, Apple's music downloading service is just one example of a closed Digital Rights Management system controlled by a single company or organization in a given market. For example, the so-called copy protected CDs have typically had proprietary DRM systems meaning that the discs can be played only on record label-specific software players. Interoperability is also a matter of degree. In some cases interoperability information is available but only under restrictive and somewhat expensive licensing terms. This is for example the case of DVD format, where DVD Copy Control Association controls the necessary information to produce compatible DVD players. Arguably, proprietary DRM systems are in general problematic to both consumers and competitors. This article analyses DRM interoperability in the light of EU copyright, competition and consumer laws. First, it is asked why copyright directive lacks an explicit interoperability provision and to what extent the directive, however, may allow the development and marketing of compatible devices. Then, the interoperability provisions in the 1991 software directive and their applicability to DRM systems are discussed. The situation is briefly compared to the United States and the possibility of national copyright policies is mentioned following the French example. Second, the article considers EC competition law as a means to enforce interoperability in DRM systems. Analogies are drawn from existing case law. Third, the role of consumer protection regulation in the DRM interoperability debate is discussed following the lead of Scandinavian consumer protection authorities. In the end, the article discusses whether there is a need to recognize interoperability as a general principle in the EU intellectual property policy and what measures could be used to strengthen such policy. Competition policy approach is suggested to provide a formal legal doctrine that could be in the long term implemented in intellectual property laws. In the meantime, consumer protection law can be used as a transitional tool for opening up the most far-reaching DRM systems.","PeriodicalId":425688,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Copyright Law & Policy (Sub-Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation & Copyright Law & Policy (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1261643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Apple's dominating music downloading service iTunes Music Store has brought interoperability debate once again on the table. To be sure, Apple's music downloading service is just one example of a closed Digital Rights Management system controlled by a single company or organization in a given market. For example, the so-called copy protected CDs have typically had proprietary DRM systems meaning that the discs can be played only on record label-specific software players. Interoperability is also a matter of degree. In some cases interoperability information is available but only under restrictive and somewhat expensive licensing terms. This is for example the case of DVD format, where DVD Copy Control Association controls the necessary information to produce compatible DVD players. Arguably, proprietary DRM systems are in general problematic to both consumers and competitors. This article analyses DRM interoperability in the light of EU copyright, competition and consumer laws. First, it is asked why copyright directive lacks an explicit interoperability provision and to what extent the directive, however, may allow the development and marketing of compatible devices. Then, the interoperability provisions in the 1991 software directive and their applicability to DRM systems are discussed. The situation is briefly compared to the United States and the possibility of national copyright policies is mentioned following the French example. Second, the article considers EC competition law as a means to enforce interoperability in DRM systems. Analogies are drawn from existing case law. Third, the role of consumer protection regulation in the DRM interoperability debate is discussed following the lead of Scandinavian consumer protection authorities. In the end, the article discusses whether there is a need to recognize interoperability as a general principle in the EU intellectual property policy and what measures could be used to strengthen such policy. Competition policy approach is suggested to provide a formal legal doctrine that could be in the long term implemented in intellectual property laws. In the meantime, consumer protection law can be used as a transitional tool for opening up the most far-reaching DRM systems.
欧洲DRM互操作性与知识产权政策
苹果主导的音乐下载服务iTunes音乐商店再次将互操作性的争论提上了台。可以肯定的是,苹果的音乐下载服务只是一个封闭的数字版权管理系统的例子,该系统由一个特定市场上的单一公司或组织控制。例如,所谓的拷贝保护cd通常具有专有的DRM系统,这意味着这些光盘只能在唱片公司特定的软件播放器上播放。互操作性也是一个程度问题。在某些情况下,互操作性信息是可用的,但只有在限制性的和有些昂贵的许可条款下才可用。这是DVD格式的例子,其中DVD拷贝控制协会控制必要的信息来生产兼容的DVD播放器。可以说,专有DRM系统通常对消费者和竞争对手都是有问题的。本文从欧盟版权法、竞争法和消费者法的角度分析了DRM的互操作性。首先,有人问为什么版权指令缺乏明确的互操作性规定,以及该指令在多大程度上允许开发和销售兼容设备。然后,讨论了1991年软件指令中的互操作性条款及其在DRM系统中的适用性。简要地将这种情况与美国进行比较,并以法国为例提到国家版权政策的可能性。其次,本文认为欧共体竞争法是加强DRM系统互操作性的一种手段。类比是从现有的判例法中得出的。第三,在斯堪的纳维亚消费者保护当局的领导下,讨论了消费者保护法规在DRM互操作性辩论中的作用。最后,本文讨论了是否有必要将互操作性作为欧盟知识产权政策的一般原则,以及可以采用哪些措施来加强这一政策。建议竞争政策方法提供一种可以在知识产权法中长期实施的正式法律原则。与此同时,消费者保护法可以作为一个过渡工具,开放最深远的DRM制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信