Kajian Filantropi di Indonesia: Studi Undang-Undang Pengumpulan Uang Atau Barang dan Undang-Undang Zakat

Erik Dwi Prassetyo, Layla Aulia
{"title":"Kajian Filantropi di Indonesia: Studi Undang-Undang Pengumpulan Uang Atau Barang dan Undang-Undang Zakat","authors":"Erik Dwi Prassetyo, Layla Aulia","doi":"10.14421/al-mazaahib.v10i2.2771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philanthropy is an important aspect that can improve people's welfare, therefore the government must make regulations regarding good philanthropy by existing legal requirements. However, the current regulations, namely the regulations CMG and the Zakat regulations, are considered to still have weaknesses, as well as the large philanthropic benefits that exist will be difficult to achieve. This research focuses on a comparative study between the rules CMG and the Zakat regulations with the main issues being the first, how philanthropy is regulated in the two regulations, and second, how the comparison is between the two. This research is a type of normative legal research (library) with a comparative method and statutory approach. The source of this research data is from laws, books, or journals that are relevant to the discussion. The results of this study indicate that philanthropic arrangements in Zakat regulations are more ideal and effective when compared to regulations CMG which still have many weaknesses. These weaknesses can be seen from aspects of technology utilization, requirements, reporting, financing of organizational activities, guidance and supervision, and finally related to sanctions. It seems that it can be seen that both laws regulate provisions regarding licensing, accountability, and law enforcement. Meanwhile, the difference is that there are no regulations regarding the CMG, provisions regarding licensing requirements, community participation, special management, guidance and supervision agencies, administrative sanctions, as well as provisions on the number of criminal sanctions and fines.","PeriodicalId":375931,"journal":{"name":"Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum","volume":"PP 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v10i2.2771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Philanthropy is an important aspect that can improve people's welfare, therefore the government must make regulations regarding good philanthropy by existing legal requirements. However, the current regulations, namely the regulations CMG and the Zakat regulations, are considered to still have weaknesses, as well as the large philanthropic benefits that exist will be difficult to achieve. This research focuses on a comparative study between the rules CMG and the Zakat regulations with the main issues being the first, how philanthropy is regulated in the two regulations, and second, how the comparison is between the two. This research is a type of normative legal research (library) with a comparative method and statutory approach. The source of this research data is from laws, books, or journals that are relevant to the discussion. The results of this study indicate that philanthropic arrangements in Zakat regulations are more ideal and effective when compared to regulations CMG which still have many weaknesses. These weaknesses can be seen from aspects of technology utilization, requirements, reporting, financing of organizational activities, guidance and supervision, and finally related to sanctions. It seems that it can be seen that both laws regulate provisions regarding licensing, accountability, and law enforcement. Meanwhile, the difference is that there are no regulations regarding the CMG, provisions regarding licensing requirements, community participation, special management, guidance and supervision agencies, administrative sanctions, as well as provisions on the number of criminal sanctions and fines.
慈善事业是提高人民福利的一个重要方面,因此政府必须根据现有的法律要求对良好的慈善事业做出规定。然而,目前的规定,即CMG的规定和天课的规定,被认为仍然存在弱点,并且存在的巨大的慈善利益将难以实现。本研究重点对CMG规则和天课规则进行比较研究,主要问题是:第一,两者如何规范慈善事业;第二,两者之间如何比较。本研究是一种采用比较法和成文法方法的规范性法律研究(库)。本研究数据的来源是与讨论相关的法律、书籍或期刊。研究结果表明,天课法规中的慈善安排比天课法规更理想、更有效,但天课法规仍有许多不足之处。这些弱点可以从技术利用、需求、报告、组织活动的筹资、指导和监督以及最后与制裁有关的各个方面看到。似乎可以看出,两部法律都规定了有关许可、问责和执法的规定。与此同时,不同之处在于,中国没有关于中央管理委员会的规定,没有关于许可要求、社区参与、专门管理、指导和监督机构、行政处罚的规定,也没有关于刑事处罚和罚款数量的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信