Visibility and impact of the scientific production on cranial nerve teaching and learning published in Scopus

Mario Javier Garces Ginarte, Eduardo Adiel Landrove-Escalona, Fidel Jesús Moreno-Cubela, Roxana Toledo del Yano
{"title":"Visibility and impact of the scientific production on cranial nerve teaching and learning published in Scopus","authors":"Mario Javier Garces Ginarte, Eduardo Adiel Landrove-Escalona, Fidel Jesús Moreno-Cubela, Roxana Toledo del Yano","doi":"10.56294/dm20224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The study of the nervous system can be challenging for students in the basic cycle of medical sciences. This study is specifically focused on the teaching-learning process of the cranial nerves.\nObjective: The aim of this study is to describe the visibility and impact of scientific production related to the teaching-learning process of the cranial nerves in Scopus.\nMethod: A bibliometric analysis of articles on the teaching-learning process of the cranial nerves published between 2017 and 2021 in the Scopus database was carried out. Production, visibility, and impact variables were analyzed, including the number of documents, number of citations, and weighted citation impact.\nResults: A total of 64 articles were published, with the highest production in 2019 (25%; n = 16). The articles received a total of 282 citations, with 30.6% of them corresponding to 2017. The highest weighted citation impact value was reported in 2017 (1.3). Collaborative international articles accounted for 13.3%, while single authorship represented 7.2%. National collaboration works had a higher average citation per publication (4.9; n = 163) and a better weighted citation impact index (1.14).\nConclusions: The study found a low scientific production on the teaching-learning of the cranial nerves, with a decreasing trend and a predominance of multiple authorship, mainly national and institutional. The impact index of publications was found to be low based on their citations.","PeriodicalId":388306,"journal":{"name":"Data & Metadata","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data & Metadata","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56294/dm20224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: The study of the nervous system can be challenging for students in the basic cycle of medical sciences. This study is specifically focused on the teaching-learning process of the cranial nerves. Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the visibility and impact of scientific production related to the teaching-learning process of the cranial nerves in Scopus. Method: A bibliometric analysis of articles on the teaching-learning process of the cranial nerves published between 2017 and 2021 in the Scopus database was carried out. Production, visibility, and impact variables were analyzed, including the number of documents, number of citations, and weighted citation impact. Results: A total of 64 articles were published, with the highest production in 2019 (25%; n = 16). The articles received a total of 282 citations, with 30.6% of them corresponding to 2017. The highest weighted citation impact value was reported in 2017 (1.3). Collaborative international articles accounted for 13.3%, while single authorship represented 7.2%. National collaboration works had a higher average citation per publication (4.9; n = 163) and a better weighted citation impact index (1.14). Conclusions: The study found a low scientific production on the teaching-learning of the cranial nerves, with a decreasing trend and a predominance of multiple authorship, mainly national and institutional. The impact index of publications was found to be low based on their citations.
在Scopus上发表的颅神经教与学科学成果的可见度和影响
导读:神经系统的研究对医学基础周期的学生来说是具有挑战性的。本研究特别关注脑神经的教-学过程。目的:本研究的目的是描述与Scopus颅神经教学过程相关的科学成果的可见性和影响。方法:对Scopus数据库中2017 - 2021年发表的有关脑神经教学过程的文章进行文献计量学分析。分析了产量、可见性和影响变量,包括文件数量、引用次数和加权引用影响。结果:共发表论文64篇,2019年产量最高(25%;N = 16)。论文被引用282次,其中30.6%为2017年。2017年报告的加权引文影响值最高(1.3)。国际合作论文占13.3%,单一作者占7.2%。国家合作作品的平均引用次数更高(4.9次;N = 163)和更好的加权引文影响指数(1.14)。结论:研究发现脑神经教与学的科学产出较低,且呈下降趋势,以多作者为主,以国家和机构为主。从引用的角度来看,出版物的影响指数较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信