Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Pengangkut DHL Express Terhadap Pengiriman Barang dari Jakarta ke Malang ( Studi Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 733/Pdt.G/2017/PN.JKT.SEL.)

Chriesty Angeline, Siti Nurbaiti
{"title":"Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Pengangkut DHL Express Terhadap Pengiriman Barang dari Jakarta ke Malang ( Studi Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 733/Pdt.G/2017/PN.JKT.SEL.)","authors":"Chriesty Angeline, Siti Nurbaiti","doi":"10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a transportation agreement, practice the rights and obligations of the parties are not always fulfilled, because during the process of shipping, sometimes it does not always went well, even there is the package disappearance cases. For example, a case that occurred between the DHL Express transport company and the sender Massayu Chairani who was disadvantage due to the loss of her package that the company agreed to delivered. How the company DHL Express responsibility of the shipping to the sender in transportation from Jakarta to Malang and How the District Court Decision Number 733 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PN.JKT.SEL regarding the responsibility of the shipping company DHL Express to the sender in transportation from Jakarta to Malang continue to make a discussion. The research method used is descriptive normative legal research method, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data with the law approach. The results of research illustrate that DHL Express does not give full responsibility to the sender and the results of judges' decisions that do not grant full compensation claims are also considered not in accordance with Article 91 KUHD and Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation in Article 188 and Article 193 paragraph (1). It is recommended that DHL Express give full responsibility to the sender of the goods for transporting goods from Jakarta to Malang and should have a court decision can decide the case more carefully to grant full compensation claims.","PeriodicalId":206816,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a transportation agreement, practice the rights and obligations of the parties are not always fulfilled, because during the process of shipping, sometimes it does not always went well, even there is the package disappearance cases. For example, a case that occurred between the DHL Express transport company and the sender Massayu Chairani who was disadvantage due to the loss of her package that the company agreed to delivered. How the company DHL Express responsibility of the shipping to the sender in transportation from Jakarta to Malang and How the District Court Decision Number 733 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PN.JKT.SEL regarding the responsibility of the shipping company DHL Express to the sender in transportation from Jakarta to Malang continue to make a discussion. The research method used is descriptive normative legal research method, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data with the law approach. The results of research illustrate that DHL Express does not give full responsibility to the sender and the results of judges' decisions that do not grant full compensation claims are also considered not in accordance with Article 91 KUHD and Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation in Article 188 and Article 193 paragraph (1). It is recommended that DHL Express give full responsibility to the sender of the goods for transporting goods from Jakarta to Malang and should have a court decision can decide the case more carefully to grant full compensation claims.
DHL Express货运公司的责任是将货物从雅加达运往马郎(判决编号733/Pdt.G/2017/PN JKT. cell)。
在运输协议中,实践当事人的权利和义务并不总是履行的,因为在运输过程中,有时它并不总是进行得很顺利,甚至出现了包裹丢失的情况。例如,发生在DHL快递公司和发件人masayu Chairani之间的案件,发件人因丢失了公司同意交付的包裹而处于不利地位。DHL快递公司如何负责发货人在雅加达到玛琅的运输以及地区法院如何判决733 / Pdt号。G / 2017 / PN.JKT.SEL关于运输公司DHL Express对发件人在雅加达至玛琅的运输中的责任继续进行讨论。研究方法采用描述性规范法学研究方法,以二次数据和一手数据作为支撑数据,运用法学方法。研究的结果说明,DHL快递不给发送者和全部责任的结果,法官的决定不给予充分赔偿也被认为是不依照本法第91条KUHD和法律数量22 2009年关于道路交通和运输在第188条和第193条(1)款。建议DHL快递给发送方的货物全部责任运输货物从雅加达到玛琅,应该有了法院的判决可以更仔细地判定案件是否给予全额赔偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信