Apocalypse Now: The WTO Dispute Settlement System in the Times of Trump

L. Gruszczynski
{"title":"Apocalypse Now: The WTO Dispute Settlement System in the Times of Trump","authors":"L. Gruszczynski","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3919196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the crisis of the WTO dispute settlement system (DSS) in connection with the blocking of the appointment of new Appellate Body (AB) members by the United States (US). In this context, it investigates the reasons behind this decision and evaluates the reactions of the other WTO Members. It also reviews different solutions which have been proposed /implemented in order to save the AB and the WTO DSS more generally. The article concludes that the objective of the Trump administration was to freeze the WTO DSS, which it considered as a mechanism that could have potentially restricted its freedom to implement its unilateral trade policy, while the specific legal objections were simply instrumental in that process. The chapter recognizes that it is still too early to draw any general conclusions on the stance of the new US administration over the current multilateral trade architecture. However, considering the new American approach to multilateralism in general, one may remain moderately optimistic vis-à-vis the revival of the AB.","PeriodicalId":122765,"journal":{"name":"LSN: WTO Law (Topic)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: WTO Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3919196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter examines the crisis of the WTO dispute settlement system (DSS) in connection with the blocking of the appointment of new Appellate Body (AB) members by the United States (US). In this context, it investigates the reasons behind this decision and evaluates the reactions of the other WTO Members. It also reviews different solutions which have been proposed /implemented in order to save the AB and the WTO DSS more generally. The article concludes that the objective of the Trump administration was to freeze the WTO DSS, which it considered as a mechanism that could have potentially restricted its freedom to implement its unilateral trade policy, while the specific legal objections were simply instrumental in that process. The chapter recognizes that it is still too early to draw any general conclusions on the stance of the new US administration over the current multilateral trade architecture. However, considering the new American approach to multilateralism in general, one may remain moderately optimistic vis-à-vis the revival of the AB.
《现代启示录:特朗普时代的WTO争端解决机制
本章探讨世贸组织争端解决机制(DSS)的危机与美国(US)阻止任命新的上诉机构(AB)成员有关。在此背景下,它调查了这一决定背后的原因,并评估了其他WTO成员的反应。它还审查了为更普遍地挽救AB和世贸组织决策支助系统而提出/实施的不同解决办法。这篇文章的结论是,特朗普政府的目标是冻结WTO的DSS,它认为这是一种可能限制其实施单边贸易政策自由的机制,而具体的法律异议只是在这一过程中的工具。本章承认,现在就美国新政府对当前多边贸易架构的立场得出任何一般性结论还为时过早。然而,考虑到美国对多边主义的新态度,人们可能会对-à-vis亚投行的复兴保持适度乐观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信