Removal of beta 2-microglobulin by hemodialysis and hemofiltration: a four year follow up.

H Schiffl, B D'Agostini, E Held
{"title":"Removal of beta 2-microglobulin by hemodialysis and hemofiltration: a four year follow up.","authors":"H Schiffl,&nbsp;B D'Agostini,&nbsp;E Held","doi":"10.3109/10731199209117348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efficient removal of total body burden beta 2-Microglobulin (beta 2-M) in uremia is a continuing challenge, as dialysis-related amyloidosis represents a major complication of chronic renal replacement therapy. To investigate long-term beta 2-M removal we studied 3 groups of stable end-staged renal failure patients over a period of 4 years; we compared low flux (cuprophane) hemodialysis (n = 12), high flux (polysulfone) hemodialysis (n = 12) and hemofiltration using high flux polysulfone (n = 8). In contrast to the cuprophane membrane, the polysulfone membrane eliminated considerable amounts of beta 2-M. This was associated with a sustained reduction of predialysis serum beta 2-M-levels (by 20%). Compared with high flux hemodialysis, hemofiltration provided a 50% higher elimination of beta 2-M. Thus, our long-term evaluation of beta 2-M removal suggests that hemofiltration rather than hemodialysis may be the treatment of choice for delaying the incidence of dialysis-related amyloidosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":77039,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterials, artificial cells, and immobilization biotechnology : official journal of the International Society for Artificial Cells and Immobilization Biotechnology","volume":"20 5","pages":"1223-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10731199209117348","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterials, artificial cells, and immobilization biotechnology : official journal of the International Society for Artificial Cells and Immobilization Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10731199209117348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Efficient removal of total body burden beta 2-Microglobulin (beta 2-M) in uremia is a continuing challenge, as dialysis-related amyloidosis represents a major complication of chronic renal replacement therapy. To investigate long-term beta 2-M removal we studied 3 groups of stable end-staged renal failure patients over a period of 4 years; we compared low flux (cuprophane) hemodialysis (n = 12), high flux (polysulfone) hemodialysis (n = 12) and hemofiltration using high flux polysulfone (n = 8). In contrast to the cuprophane membrane, the polysulfone membrane eliminated considerable amounts of beta 2-M. This was associated with a sustained reduction of predialysis serum beta 2-M-levels (by 20%). Compared with high flux hemodialysis, hemofiltration provided a 50% higher elimination of beta 2-M. Thus, our long-term evaluation of beta 2-M removal suggests that hemofiltration rather than hemodialysis may be the treatment of choice for delaying the incidence of dialysis-related amyloidosis.

通过血液透析和血液过滤去除β 2微球蛋白:四年随访。
尿毒症患者体内β 2-微球蛋白(β 2-M)的有效清除是一个持续的挑战,因为透析相关淀粉样变性是慢性肾脏替代治疗的主要并发症。为了研究长期β 2-M的去除,我们研究了3组稳定的终末期肾衰竭患者,为期4年;我们比较了低通量(库帕芬)血液透析(n = 12)、高通量(聚砜)血液透析(n = 12)和使用高通量聚砜进行血液过滤(n = 8)。与库帕芬膜相比,聚砜膜消除了相当数量的β 2-M。这与透析前血清β 2- m水平持续降低(20%)有关。与高通量血液透析相比,血液滤过可使β 2-M的消除率提高50%。因此,我们对β 2-M去除的长期评估表明,血液滤过而不是血液透析可能是延迟透析相关淀粉样变发生的首选治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信