Know Your Enemy – Improvements in Managing the Threat of Hard Spots

Khanh Tran, S. Slater, J. Edwards
{"title":"Know Your Enemy – Improvements in Managing the Threat of Hard Spots","authors":"Khanh Tran, S. Slater, J. Edwards","doi":"10.1115/ipc2022-88362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Operators of gas and liquid pipelines are expected to manage the threats associated with hard spots as part of their Integrity Management Plan (IMP). Over the past two years, a considerable amount of work has been completed to assess hard spots and characterize exactly what these features are, and how they can be managed. There is a significant body of data from ILI and metallurgical verification to develop a more complete understanding of the threat from hard spots. A hard spot is a localized increase in hardness compared to the surrounding base metal, which is defined in API 5L as an area larger than two inches in any direction and a hardness greater than 327 HBW [1]. Hard spots have been observed on EFW and DSAW pipes of various grades. The data collected confirms that there are different types of hard spots, which vary depending on the specific thermal cycles that create them. In the majority of cases, hard spots are introduced during the plate or pipe manufacturing process, and therefore can be related to specific pipe types, batches or manufacturers. It follows that understanding the types of pipes present within a pipeline system can help with susceptibility analysis and threat management. This fits with updated regulatory requirements driving the industry to verify material properties and attributes to support integrity management, when they are not evidenced by traceable, verifiable and complete (TVC) records. This paper discusses the processes used to assess, characterize and size hard spots, providing the information needed to make informed integrity decisions. Examples of different types of hard spots will be presented and discussed in relation to the various pipe types that can be differentiated using ILI-based material property verification. The paper will demonstrate how a close collaborative approach between operators and vendors can yield significant improvements in technology, processes and the integrity management plan.","PeriodicalId":264830,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-88362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Operators of gas and liquid pipelines are expected to manage the threats associated with hard spots as part of their Integrity Management Plan (IMP). Over the past two years, a considerable amount of work has been completed to assess hard spots and characterize exactly what these features are, and how they can be managed. There is a significant body of data from ILI and metallurgical verification to develop a more complete understanding of the threat from hard spots. A hard spot is a localized increase in hardness compared to the surrounding base metal, which is defined in API 5L as an area larger than two inches in any direction and a hardness greater than 327 HBW [1]. Hard spots have been observed on EFW and DSAW pipes of various grades. The data collected confirms that there are different types of hard spots, which vary depending on the specific thermal cycles that create them. In the majority of cases, hard spots are introduced during the plate or pipe manufacturing process, and therefore can be related to specific pipe types, batches or manufacturers. It follows that understanding the types of pipes present within a pipeline system can help with susceptibility analysis and threat management. This fits with updated regulatory requirements driving the industry to verify material properties and attributes to support integrity management, when they are not evidenced by traceable, verifiable and complete (TVC) records. This paper discusses the processes used to assess, characterize and size hard spots, providing the information needed to make informed integrity decisions. Examples of different types of hard spots will be presented and discussed in relation to the various pipe types that can be differentiated using ILI-based material property verification. The paper will demonstrate how a close collaborative approach between operators and vendors can yield significant improvements in technology, processes and the integrity management plan.
了解你的敌人-改善管理硬点的威胁
作为完整性管理计划(IMP)的一部分,天然气和液体管道运营商需要管理与硬点相关的威胁。在过去的两年中,已经完成了相当多的工作来评估难点,准确地描述这些特征是什么,以及如何管理它们。来自ILI和冶金验证的大量数据有助于更全面地了解来自硬点的威胁。硬斑是指相对于周围母材的局部硬度增加,在API 5L中定义为任何方向的面积大于2英寸且硬度大于327 HBW[1]。在不同等级的EFW和DSAW管上观察到硬点。收集到的数据证实,存在不同类型的硬斑,这些硬斑取决于产生它们的特定热循环。在大多数情况下,硬点是在板材或管道制造过程中引入的,因此可以与特定的管道类型,批次或制造商有关。因此,了解管道系统中存在的管道类型可以帮助进行易感性分析和威胁管理。这符合最新的法规要求,促使行业在没有可追溯、可验证和完整(TVC)记录的情况下验证材料的特性和属性,以支持完整性管理。本文讨论了用于评估、表征和确定硬点大小的过程,提供了做出明智的完整性决策所需的信息。将介绍和讨论不同类型的硬点的例子,这些硬点与可以使用基于i的材料性能验证来区分的各种管道类型有关。本文将展示运营商和供应商之间的紧密合作方式如何在技术、流程和完整性管理计划方面产生重大改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信