Social Computing and Governance in an Enterprise Service for Managing Business Processes

Melissa J. Buco, H. Jamjoom, Mark Podlaseck, Huiming Qu
{"title":"Social Computing and Governance in an Enterprise Service for Managing Business Processes","authors":"Melissa J. Buco, H. Jamjoom, Mark Podlaseck, Huiming Qu","doi":"10.1109/SERVICES-2.2009.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The enterprise has historically been ambivalent about Social Computing. Although dynamic communities, collaboration, innovation, and the wisdom of crowds were recognized as valuable, doubts about content quality and standards frequently overshadowed the benefits that Social Computing had already demonstrated outside the enterprise. In this paper, we describe how we have been challenged to add governance to an existing enterprise wiki designed for capturing, collaborating on, and evolving best practice business process assets. With the addition of governance, our goal has been to transform a best practice process wiki into an authoritative source for process assets for the enterprise, a repository for registering usage, tracking variations, and linking process assets to one another and to other assets (e.g. accounts) and a vehicle for continual improvement of process assets through annotation, rating, and collaboration. The extensive scope of the content in this project dictates that both the creation and the governance of the content be distributed to the appropriate level of the community. It also requires functions to assist users with leveraging potentially significant amount of user feedback. Overall, the focus of the project has been on maintaining the quality of the content while fostering its continuous improvement and relevance to the community.","PeriodicalId":299945,"journal":{"name":"2009 World Conference on Services - II","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 World Conference on Services - II","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SERVICES-2.2009.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The enterprise has historically been ambivalent about Social Computing. Although dynamic communities, collaboration, innovation, and the wisdom of crowds were recognized as valuable, doubts about content quality and standards frequently overshadowed the benefits that Social Computing had already demonstrated outside the enterprise. In this paper, we describe how we have been challenged to add governance to an existing enterprise wiki designed for capturing, collaborating on, and evolving best practice business process assets. With the addition of governance, our goal has been to transform a best practice process wiki into an authoritative source for process assets for the enterprise, a repository for registering usage, tracking variations, and linking process assets to one another and to other assets (e.g. accounts) and a vehicle for continual improvement of process assets through annotation, rating, and collaboration. The extensive scope of the content in this project dictates that both the creation and the governance of the content be distributed to the appropriate level of the community. It also requires functions to assist users with leveraging potentially significant amount of user feedback. Overall, the focus of the project has been on maintaining the quality of the content while fostering its continuous improvement and relevance to the community.
用于管理业务流程的企业服务中的社会计算和治理
企业历来对社会计算持矛盾态度。尽管动态社区、协作、创新和群体智慧被认为是有价值的,但对内容质量和标准的怀疑经常掩盖了社会计算在企业外部已经展示的好处。在本文中,我们描述了如何将治理添加到现有的企业wiki中,该wiki是为捕获、协作和发展最佳实践业务流程资产而设计的。随着治理的加入,我们的目标是将最佳实践过程wiki转换为企业过程资产的权威来源,一个用于注册使用情况、跟踪变化、将过程资产相互链接以及与其他资产(例如帐户)链接的存储库,以及一个通过注释、评级和协作持续改进过程资产的工具。该项目中内容的广泛范围决定了内容的创建和治理都要分布到社区的适当级别。它还需要帮助用户利用潜在的大量用户反馈的功能。总体而言,该项目的重点是保持内容的质量,同时促进其不断改进和与社区的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信