COMPARISON OF HYDRODISECTION INJECTION BETWEEN TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE VERSUS DEXAMETHASONE IN CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME

Widodo Mardi Santoso, B. Munir, Catur Ari Setianto, Ria Damayanti, Sheny Agma
{"title":"COMPARISON OF HYDRODISECTION INJECTION BETWEEN TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE VERSUS DEXAMETHASONE IN CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME","authors":"Widodo Mardi Santoso, B. Munir, Catur Ari Setianto, Ria Damayanti, Sheny Agma","doi":"10.21776/ub.jphv.2021.002.02.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nontraumatic peripheral neuropathy, which is caused by suppression of the median nerve below the transverse carpi ligament. Local corticosteroid injection is considered the fastest and most effective method for improving symptoms that occur in CTS. There are several corticosteroid agents that can be used, but there are no objective standards that can explain the most ideal drugs. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of hydrodisection injection therapy of triamcinolone acetonide versus dexamethasone on carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: This study involved 30 participants who were diagnosed with CTS and fulfilled the inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria were obtained. Participants were divided into two treatment groups; the first group (n = 15) injected with Triamcinolone Acetonide (TCA) 10mg / 1ml and lidocaine 1% 1 ml and the second group (n = 15) injected with Dexamethasone 4mg / 0.8ml and lidocaine 1% 1 ml. The NRS, FSS, and SSS parameters were assessed before injection and 4 weeks after injection in each agent. Then compared these parameters at 4 weeks after injection compared to the TCA group with the dexamethasone group. Results: NRS score before and 4 weeks after TCA injection (sig 0.000; p <0.05), SSS (sig 0.001; p <0.05) and FSS (sig 0.020; p <0.05), and NRS score before and 4 weeks after dexamethasone injection (sig 0.001; p <0.05), SSS (sig 0,000; p <0.05) and FSS (sig 0,000; p <0.05). At 4 weeks after injection of TCA compared to dexamethasone there were no significant results on NRS (sig 0.237; p> 0.05) and FSS (sig 0.119; p> 0.05), while SSS values were significantly different (sig 0.027; p <0.05). Conclusion: Significant improvement in NRS, FSS and SSS score was obtained at 4 weeks after hydrodisection injection, both with TCA and dexamethasone. At 4 weeks after TCA injection compared to dexamethasone, there were no significant differences in NRS and FSS scores, whereas SSS score differed significantly. Both injection agents are equally effective in treating CTS, but dexamethasone produces a better improvement in SSS score.","PeriodicalId":126692,"journal":{"name":"JPHV (Journal of Pain, Vertigo and Headache)","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPHV (Journal of Pain, Vertigo and Headache)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jphv.2021.002.02.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nontraumatic peripheral neuropathy, which is caused by suppression of the median nerve below the transverse carpi ligament. Local corticosteroid injection is considered the fastest and most effective method for improving symptoms that occur in CTS. There are several corticosteroid agents that can be used, but there are no objective standards that can explain the most ideal drugs. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of hydrodisection injection therapy of triamcinolone acetonide versus dexamethasone on carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: This study involved 30 participants who were diagnosed with CTS and fulfilled the inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria were obtained. Participants were divided into two treatment groups; the first group (n = 15) injected with Triamcinolone Acetonide (TCA) 10mg / 1ml and lidocaine 1% 1 ml and the second group (n = 15) injected with Dexamethasone 4mg / 0.8ml and lidocaine 1% 1 ml. The NRS, FSS, and SSS parameters were assessed before injection and 4 weeks after injection in each agent. Then compared these parameters at 4 weeks after injection compared to the TCA group with the dexamethasone group. Results: NRS score before and 4 weeks after TCA injection (sig 0.000; p <0.05), SSS (sig 0.001; p <0.05) and FSS (sig 0.020; p <0.05), and NRS score before and 4 weeks after dexamethasone injection (sig 0.001; p <0.05), SSS (sig 0,000; p <0.05) and FSS (sig 0,000; p <0.05). At 4 weeks after injection of TCA compared to dexamethasone there were no significant results on NRS (sig 0.237; p> 0.05) and FSS (sig 0.119; p> 0.05), while SSS values were significantly different (sig 0.027; p <0.05). Conclusion: Significant improvement in NRS, FSS and SSS score was obtained at 4 weeks after hydrodisection injection, both with TCA and dexamethasone. At 4 weeks after TCA injection compared to dexamethasone, there were no significant differences in NRS and FSS scores, whereas SSS score differed significantly. Both injection agents are equally effective in treating CTS, but dexamethasone produces a better improvement in SSS score.
盐酸曲安奈德与地塞米松注射治疗腕管综合征的比较
背景:腕管综合征(Carpal tunnel syndrome, CTS)是最常见的非外伤性周围神经病变,是由于腕横韧带下方正中神经受到抑制而引起的。局部皮质类固醇注射被认为是改善CTS症状的最快和最有效的方法。有几种皮质类固醇药物可以使用,但没有客观的标准可以解释最理想的药物。目的:比较曲安奈德与地塞米松对腕管综合征的疗效。方法:本研究纳入30例诊断为CTS且符合纳入标准的受试者,无排除标准。参与者被分为两个治疗组;第一组(n = 15)注射曲安奈德(TCA) 10mg / 1ml、利多卡因1% 1ml;第二组(n = 15)注射地塞米松4mg / 0.8ml、利多卡因1% 1ml。分别于注射前和注射后4周评价各药物的NRS、FSS、SSS参数。然后在注射后4周将这些参数与TCA组和地塞米松组进行比较。结果:TCA注射前和注射后4周NRS评分(sig 0.000;p 0.05)和FSS (sig 0.119;p> 0.05),而SSS值差异有统计学意义(sig 0.027;p < 0.05)。结论:TCA和地塞米松均可显著改善小鼠的NRS、FSS和SSS评分。与地塞米松相比,注射TCA后4周,NRS和FSS评分无显著差异,而SSS评分差异显著。两种注射剂治疗CTS的效果相同,但地塞米松对SSS评分的改善效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信