Impact of Medical Legal Partnerships: A Scoping Review

Danny Jomaa, C. Ranasinghe, Nicole Raymer, Michele M. Leering, I. Bayoumi
{"title":"Impact of Medical Legal Partnerships: A Scoping Review","authors":"Danny Jomaa, C. Ranasinghe, Nicole Raymer, Michele M. Leering, I. Bayoumi","doi":"10.33137/utjph.v3i2.38094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nMedical Legal Partnerships (MLPs) are collaborations between healthcare and legal services that aim to address the health-harming impacts of unmet legal needs. Better characterization of existing MLP models would be a resource for new and expanding MLPs to glean insight into challenges and opportunities to consider. This scoping review aimed to examine and map outcomes reported by MLPs.\nMethods\nMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Index to Legal Periodicals databases were searched and studies reporting qualitative or quantitative outcomes of a MLP were eligible for inclusion. Independent dual review of titles, abstracts, and full-texts was conducted and the reported outcomes were analyzed.\nResults\nThirty studies met inclusion criteria. Children and families were the most commonly served populations. The most frequently addressed legal needs pertained to housing, income, and personal/family stability. MLPs were associated with improved health, health services use, and legal outcomes. Education of healthcare professionals was associated with increased knowledge and confidence in addressing social needs.\nDiscussion\nOverall, MLPs effectively partner healthcare and legal services to mitigate the health-harming consequences of unmet legal needs. MLPs facilitate access to care in legal circumstances that would otherwise exacerbate health conditions, and largely benefit communities that have been historically underserved by medical and legal systems.","PeriodicalId":265882,"journal":{"name":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/utjph.v3i2.38094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Medical Legal Partnerships (MLPs) are collaborations between healthcare and legal services that aim to address the health-harming impacts of unmet legal needs. Better characterization of existing MLP models would be a resource for new and expanding MLPs to glean insight into challenges and opportunities to consider. This scoping review aimed to examine and map outcomes reported by MLPs. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Index to Legal Periodicals databases were searched and studies reporting qualitative or quantitative outcomes of a MLP were eligible for inclusion. Independent dual review of titles, abstracts, and full-texts was conducted and the reported outcomes were analyzed. Results Thirty studies met inclusion criteria. Children and families were the most commonly served populations. The most frequently addressed legal needs pertained to housing, income, and personal/family stability. MLPs were associated with improved health, health services use, and legal outcomes. Education of healthcare professionals was associated with increased knowledge and confidence in addressing social needs. Discussion Overall, MLPs effectively partner healthcare and legal services to mitigate the health-harming consequences of unmet legal needs. MLPs facilitate access to care in legal circumstances that would otherwise exacerbate health conditions, and largely benefit communities that have been historically underserved by medical and legal systems.
医疗法律伙伴关系的影响:范围审查
医疗法律伙伴关系是医疗保健和法律服务之间的合作,旨在解决未满足的法律需求对健康的危害影响。更好地描述现有MLP模型将为新的和扩展的MLP收集挑战和机遇的洞察力提供资源。这项范围审查旨在检查和绘制mlp报告的结果。方法检索medline、EMBASE、CINAHL和法律期刊索引数据库,纳入报告MLP定性或定量结果的研究。对标题、摘要和全文进行独立的双重审查,并对报告的结果进行分析。结果30项研究符合纳入标准。儿童和家庭是最常见的服务人群。最常见的法律需求涉及住房、收入和个人/家庭稳定。mlp与健康状况的改善、卫生服务的使用和法律结果有关。保健专业人员的教育与增加解决社会需求的知识和信心有关。总体而言,mlp有效地将医疗保健和法律服务结合起来,以减轻未满足的法律需求对健康造成的危害后果。mlp促进在合法情况下获得医疗服务,否则会加剧健康状况,并在很大程度上使历史上医疗和法律系统服务不足的社区受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信