Survival analysis in cancer using a partial logistic neural network model with Bayesian regularisation framework: a validation study

A. Taktak, A. Eleuteri, M. Aung, P. Lisboa, L. Desjardins, B. Damato
{"title":"Survival analysis in cancer using a partial logistic neural network model with Bayesian regularisation framework: a validation study","authors":"A. Taktak, A. Eleuteri, M. Aung, P. Lisboa, L. Desjardins, B. Damato","doi":"10.1504/IJKESDP.2009.028819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes a multicentre longitudinal cohort study to evaluate the predictive accuracy of a regularised Bayesian neural network model in a prognostic application. The study sample (n = 5442) comprises subjects treated with intraocular melanoma in two different centres in Liverpool and Paris. External validation was carried out by fitting the model to the data from Liverpool set and predicting for the data from Paris. The performance of the model in out-of-sample prediction was assessed statistically for discrimination of outcomes and calibration. It was also evaluated clinically by comparing against the accepted TNM staging system. The model had good discrimination with Harrell's C index > 0.7 up to ten years of follow-up. Calibration results were also good up to ten years using a Hosmer-Lemeshow type analysis (p > 0.05). The paper: 1) deals with the issue of missing data using methods that are well accepted in the literature; 2) proposes a framework for externally validating machine learning models applied to survival analysis; 3) applies accepted methods for dealing with missing data; 4) proposes an alternative staging system based on the model. The new staging system, which takes into account histopathologic information, has several advantages over the existing staging system.","PeriodicalId":347123,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Knowl. Eng. Soft Data Paradigms","volume":"12 13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Knowl. Eng. Soft Data Paradigms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKESDP.2009.028819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper describes a multicentre longitudinal cohort study to evaluate the predictive accuracy of a regularised Bayesian neural network model in a prognostic application. The study sample (n = 5442) comprises subjects treated with intraocular melanoma in two different centres in Liverpool and Paris. External validation was carried out by fitting the model to the data from Liverpool set and predicting for the data from Paris. The performance of the model in out-of-sample prediction was assessed statistically for discrimination of outcomes and calibration. It was also evaluated clinically by comparing against the accepted TNM staging system. The model had good discrimination with Harrell's C index > 0.7 up to ten years of follow-up. Calibration results were also good up to ten years using a Hosmer-Lemeshow type analysis (p > 0.05). The paper: 1) deals with the issue of missing data using methods that are well accepted in the literature; 2) proposes a framework for externally validating machine learning models applied to survival analysis; 3) applies accepted methods for dealing with missing data; 4) proposes an alternative staging system based on the model. The new staging system, which takes into account histopathologic information, has several advantages over the existing staging system.
使用贝叶斯正则化框架的部分逻辑神经网络模型进行癌症生存分析:一项验证研究
本文描述了一项多中心纵向队列研究,以评估正则贝叶斯神经网络模型在预后应用中的预测准确性。研究样本(n = 5442)包括在利物浦和巴黎两个不同中心接受眼内黑色素瘤治疗的受试者。通过将模型拟合到来自利物浦的数据并预测来自巴黎的数据来进行外部验证。对模型在样本外预测中的表现进行了结果判别和校准的统计评估。并与公认的TNM分期系统进行临床评价。该模型具有较好的判别性,随访10年,Harrell’s C指数> 0.7。使用Hosmer-Lemeshow型分析,校准结果在10年内也很好(p > 0.05)。本文:1)采用文献公认的方法处理数据缺失问题;2)提出了一个框架,用于外部验证应用于生存分析的机器学习模型;3)采用公认的方法处理缺失数据;4)在此基础上提出了一种替代分期系统。新的分期系统,考虑到组织病理信息,有几个优势比现有的分期系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信