Left ventricular resynchronization in H.F.: Comparison of alternative optimization methods

M. Graziano, C. Valzania, D. Bianchini, G. Loreti, I. Corazza, R. Zannoli
{"title":"Left ventricular resynchronization in H.F.: Comparison of alternative optimization methods","authors":"M. Graziano, C. Valzania, D. Bianchini, G. Loreti, I. Corazza, R. Zannoli","doi":"10.1109/CIC.2008.4748995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the results of two different procedures, Doppler Ultrasound and Transthoracic Impedance, to monitor the left ventricular stroke volume on a group of heart failure patients submitted to electrical resynchronization therapy. The two procedures have been applied in parallel on 9 patients by changing the stimulation delays between the septal and posterior ventricular walls and the results have been compared to evaluate the correlation between the two choices, and their sensitivity to detect the optimal stimulation condition. The results demonstrated a good agreement between the data obtained with the two procedures (R=0.82), but a very limited change of the target parameter (Stroke Volume) by changing the stimulation delay. This suggests doubts on the choice of stroke volume as the best parameter to be observed for the optimization process and on the adequate sensitivity of the two procedures to highlight the process.","PeriodicalId":194782,"journal":{"name":"2008 Computers in Cardiology","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Computers in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2008.4748995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper compares the results of two different procedures, Doppler Ultrasound and Transthoracic Impedance, to monitor the left ventricular stroke volume on a group of heart failure patients submitted to electrical resynchronization therapy. The two procedures have been applied in parallel on 9 patients by changing the stimulation delays between the septal and posterior ventricular walls and the results have been compared to evaluate the correlation between the two choices, and their sensitivity to detect the optimal stimulation condition. The results demonstrated a good agreement between the data obtained with the two procedures (R=0.82), but a very limited change of the target parameter (Stroke Volume) by changing the stimulation delay. This suggests doubts on the choice of stroke volume as the best parameter to be observed for the optimization process and on the adequate sensitivity of the two procedures to highlight the process.
心力衰竭左心室再同步:不同优化方法的比较
本文比较了多普勒超声和经胸阻抗两种不同的方法对一组接受电再同步治疗的心力衰竭患者左室卒中容量的监测结果。通过改变室间隔和后心室壁之间的刺激延迟,将这两种方法并行应用于9例患者,并对结果进行比较,以评估两种选择之间的相关性,以及它们对检测最佳刺激条件的敏感性。结果表明,两种方法获得的数据非常吻合(R=0.82),但通过改变刺激延迟,目标参数(冲程体积)的变化非常有限。这表明对选择冲程量作为优化过程中观察的最佳参数以及对两个程序的足够灵敏度来突出过程的怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信