{"title":"Constructing diffeomorphisms between simply connected plane domains","authors":"K. Atkinson, D. Chien, O. Hansen","doi":"10.1553/etna_vol55s671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Consider a simply connected domain Ω ⊂ R 2 with boundary ∂ Ω that is given by a smooth function ϕ : [ a,b ] (cid:55)→ R 2 . Our goal is to calculate a diffeomorphism Φ : B 1 (0) (cid:55)→ Ω , B 1 (0) the open unit disk in R 2 . We present two different methods where both methods are able to handle boundaries ∂ Ω that are not star-shaped. The first method is based on an optimization algorithm that optimizes the curvature of the boundary, and the second method is based on the physical principle of minimizing a potential energy. Both methods construct first a homotopy between the boundary ∂ B 1 (0) and ∂ Ω and then extend the boundary homotopy to the inside of the domains. Numerical examples show that the method is applicable to a wide variety of domains Ω .","PeriodicalId":282695,"journal":{"name":"ETNA - Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ETNA - Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1553/etna_vol55s671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
. Consider a simply connected domain Ω ⊂ R 2 with boundary ∂ Ω that is given by a smooth function ϕ : [ a,b ] (cid:55)→ R 2 . Our goal is to calculate a diffeomorphism Φ : B 1 (0) (cid:55)→ Ω , B 1 (0) the open unit disk in R 2 . We present two different methods where both methods are able to handle boundaries ∂ Ω that are not star-shaped. The first method is based on an optimization algorithm that optimizes the curvature of the boundary, and the second method is based on the physical principle of minimizing a potential energy. Both methods construct first a homotopy between the boundary ∂ B 1 (0) and ∂ Ω and then extend the boundary homotopy to the inside of the domains. Numerical examples show that the method is applicable to a wide variety of domains Ω .