Neuroimaging. How to Question Scientific Images and Their Artistic Value

A. Pigoni, Davide Coraci, Emanuele Carlenzi
{"title":"Neuroimaging. How to Question Scientific Images and Their Artistic Value","authors":"A. Pigoni, Davide Coraci, Emanuele Carlenzi","doi":"10.30687/jolma/2723-9640/2021/01/009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unquestionable holders of aesthetic content, images have a well-known role even in conveying scientific knowledge. In the present work, we focus on the epistemological role of images within neuroscience. We first analyze the concepts of representation, similarity, and informativeness. Second, we discuss relevant case-studies, i.e., images by functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and how the pictorial interventions commonly applied on them might have an impact on their informational content. Finally, we explore the notion of imagination as a relevant faculty for modelling neuroscientific theories and the concept of creativity as an instrument to aesthetically modify brain images. These manipulations enable images to achieve the scientific purpose, altering the relation of similarity between the image and the studied phenomenon. In conclusion, this process leads to rethinking the role of the neuroscientist as an active observer.","PeriodicalId":436202,"journal":{"name":"2 | 1 | 2021\n Image/Images: A Debate Between Philosophy and Visual Studies","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2 | 1 | 2021\n Image/Images: A Debate Between Philosophy and Visual Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30687/jolma/2723-9640/2021/01/009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unquestionable holders of aesthetic content, images have a well-known role even in conveying scientific knowledge. In the present work, we focus on the epistemological role of images within neuroscience. We first analyze the concepts of representation, similarity, and informativeness. Second, we discuss relevant case-studies, i.e., images by functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and how the pictorial interventions commonly applied on them might have an impact on their informational content. Finally, we explore the notion of imagination as a relevant faculty for modelling neuroscientific theories and the concept of creativity as an instrument to aesthetically modify brain images. These manipulations enable images to achieve the scientific purpose, altering the relation of similarity between the image and the studied phenomenon. In conclusion, this process leads to rethinking the role of the neuroscientist as an active observer.
神经影像。如何质疑科学图像及其艺术价值
毫无疑问,图像是美学内容的持有者,甚至在传达科学知识方面也发挥着众所周知的作用。在目前的工作中,我们关注图像在神经科学中的认识论作用。我们首先分析了代表性、相似性和信息性的概念。其次,我们讨论了相关的案例研究,即功能性磁共振成像图像,以及通常应用于它们的图像干预如何影响其信息内容。最后,我们探讨了想象力作为神经科学理论建模的相关能力的概念,以及创造力作为美学修改大脑图像的工具的概念。这些操作使图像达到科学目的,改变图像与研究现象之间的相似关系。总之,这个过程导致重新思考神经科学家作为一个积极的观察者的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信