Comparing Hedge Funds: Highest Return Strategy

Vuk Janus, Greyson Robin Meek
{"title":"Comparing Hedge Funds: Highest Return Strategy","authors":"Vuk Janus, Greyson Robin Meek","doi":"10.32473/ufjur.v23i.128719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 1997, the hedge fund industry has grown at a compounded annual growth rate of 16.07%, resulting in a 26-fold increase from its original value to its present value of $3.1 trillion Assets Under Management. This study researched the varying investment strategies used by hedge funds to determine the strategy that provides the highest returns for its investors. From the previous literature, the study identified Long/Short Equity, Global Macro, Arbitrage, Event Driven, and Cross-Asset Multi-Strategy as viable and relevant investment approaches. Using hedge fund index data from Bloomberg, Hedge Fund Research, Eureka Hedge, Barclay’s, and Credit Suisse, returns for each respective strategy were collected and compared against the Bloomberg Global Hedge Fund (BHEDGE) Index and the S&P 500 Index. Alpha adjusted returns for each strategy were later calculated and plotted against the average weighted returns of each individual strategy. The results of this study show that the L/S Equity strategy provided the highest returns for its investors. Specifically, only the L/S Equity strategy outperformed the BHEDGE Index by a narrow margin, while all other strategies provided negative alpha figures. All hedge fund strategies outperformed the overall equity market on a year-to-date basis, however, provided negative alpha returns when compared to the S&P 500 1-Year market gains. This deficit between hedge funds and the overall equity market can be attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic and its inflationary effects through low interest rates, market stimulus packs, and an increased money supply.","PeriodicalId":278243,"journal":{"name":"UF Journal of Undergraduate Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UF Journal of Undergraduate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32473/ufjur.v23i.128719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 1997, the hedge fund industry has grown at a compounded annual growth rate of 16.07%, resulting in a 26-fold increase from its original value to its present value of $3.1 trillion Assets Under Management. This study researched the varying investment strategies used by hedge funds to determine the strategy that provides the highest returns for its investors. From the previous literature, the study identified Long/Short Equity, Global Macro, Arbitrage, Event Driven, and Cross-Asset Multi-Strategy as viable and relevant investment approaches. Using hedge fund index data from Bloomberg, Hedge Fund Research, Eureka Hedge, Barclay’s, and Credit Suisse, returns for each respective strategy were collected and compared against the Bloomberg Global Hedge Fund (BHEDGE) Index and the S&P 500 Index. Alpha adjusted returns for each strategy were later calculated and plotted against the average weighted returns of each individual strategy. The results of this study show that the L/S Equity strategy provided the highest returns for its investors. Specifically, only the L/S Equity strategy outperformed the BHEDGE Index by a narrow margin, while all other strategies provided negative alpha figures. All hedge fund strategies outperformed the overall equity market on a year-to-date basis, however, provided negative alpha returns when compared to the S&P 500 1-Year market gains. This deficit between hedge funds and the overall equity market can be attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic and its inflationary effects through low interest rates, market stimulus packs, and an increased money supply.
比较对冲基金:最高回报策略
自1997年以来,对冲基金行业以16.07%的复合年增长率增长,其资产管理规模从最初的价值增长了26倍,达到3.1万亿美元的现值。本研究研究了对冲基金使用的不同投资策略,以确定为其投资者提供最高回报的策略。从以前的文献中,研究确定了多/空股票、全球宏观、套利、事件驱动和跨资产多策略是可行的和相关的投资方法。利用彭博、对冲基金研究、尤里卡对冲、巴克莱和瑞士信贷的对冲基金指数数据,收集了每种策略的回报,并与彭博全球对冲基金指数(BHEDGE)和标准普尔500指数进行了比较。每个策略经过Alpha调整后的收益随后被计算出来,并与每个单独策略的平均加权收益进行对比。本研究结果表明,L/S股权策略为其投资者提供了最高的回报。具体来说,只有L/S股票策略以微弱优势优于BHEDGE指数,而所有其他策略都提供了负alpha数据。今年迄今,所有对冲基金策略的表现都优于整体股市,但与标准普尔500指数的1年期市场涨幅相比,其alpha回报率为负。对冲基金和股票市场之间的逆差,可以归结为新冠疫情以及低利率、市场刺激、货币供应量增加等带来的通货膨胀效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信