A Theoretical Examination of Double Jeopardy: Using Theory as a Guide to Concept Analysis

R. Coon
{"title":"A Theoretical Examination of Double Jeopardy: Using Theory as a Guide to Concept Analysis","authors":"R. Coon","doi":"10.17161/STR.1808.4994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a theoretical examination of the validity of the double jeopardy hypothesis from a number of social psychological perspectives. After a general review of the literature on double jeopardy, section two sets forth some alternative views on minority aging. In section three, foursocial psychological theories areexplicated in order to ascertain whether they would predict a double jeopardy outcome. In no case does the prediction suggest double jeopardy. Finally, a caveat is noted regarding how researchers define double jeopardy.","PeriodicalId":338053,"journal":{"name":"Social thought & research","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social thought & research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.4994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article is a theoretical examination of the validity of the double jeopardy hypothesis from a number of social psychological perspectives. After a general review of the literature on double jeopardy, section two sets forth some alternative views on minority aging. In section three, foursocial psychological theories areexplicated in order to ascertain whether they would predict a double jeopardy outcome. In no case does the prediction suggest double jeopardy. Finally, a caveat is noted regarding how researchers define double jeopardy.
双重危险的理论考察:以理论为指导进行概念分析
本文从社会心理学的角度对双重危险假说的有效性进行了理论检验。在对双重审判的文献进行一般性回顾之后,第二节提出了一些关于少数民族老龄化的不同观点。第三部分阐述了四种社会心理学理论,以确定它们是否会预测双重危险的结果。在任何情况下,这种预测都不意味着双重危险。最后,对于研究人员如何定义双重危险,需要注意一个警告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信