Conclusion

J. Mulqueen
{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"J. Mulqueen","doi":"10.3828/liverpool/9781789620641.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘Military neutrality’ and ‘political neutrality’ are not the same. The Irish authorities did not allow the state’s non-aligned status to prevent them joining the crusade in the West against communism. They had a Cold War agenda. In the 1950s, leading officials such as Colonel Dan Bryan in G2, the Irish army intelligence directorate, believed that Ireland should assist the NATO powers in their global struggle. So, too, did Peter Berry, the Department of Justice secretary in Dublin. They supplied detailed information on the tiny communist organisation to the ‘hypersensitive’ Americans, for example, and provided intelligence on ‘peace’ activists to the British. Details on suspect activists ended up in the files of the Church’s ‘vigilance’ committee – a clear breach of the separation of Church and State. As functionaries in what Berry termed the ‘communist international’, Michael O’Riordan in Dublin and Desmond Greaves in London were seen to be taking directions from the British communist party, the CPGB. The communists had their own Cold War agenda to follow, with ‘world peace’ Moscow’s priority. But this issue did not capture the imagination of the working class, as a frustrated Roy Johnston discovered. Nevertheless, orders were orders for Ireland’s ‘fifth column’. Some communist-led organisations, however, were believed to have recruitment potential. Could the CPGB-directed Connolly Association, and its equivalent in New York – both ‘dangerous’ in Bryan’s view – convert Irish exiles by highlighting issues related to Northern Ireland? Was there any possibility that communists could succeed in infiltrating the Irish republican movement?...","PeriodicalId":167023,"journal":{"name":"'An Alien Ideology'","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"'An Alien Ideology'","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781789620641.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

‘Military neutrality’ and ‘political neutrality’ are not the same. The Irish authorities did not allow the state’s non-aligned status to prevent them joining the crusade in the West against communism. They had a Cold War agenda. In the 1950s, leading officials such as Colonel Dan Bryan in G2, the Irish army intelligence directorate, believed that Ireland should assist the NATO powers in their global struggle. So, too, did Peter Berry, the Department of Justice secretary in Dublin. They supplied detailed information on the tiny communist organisation to the ‘hypersensitive’ Americans, for example, and provided intelligence on ‘peace’ activists to the British. Details on suspect activists ended up in the files of the Church’s ‘vigilance’ committee – a clear breach of the separation of Church and State. As functionaries in what Berry termed the ‘communist international’, Michael O’Riordan in Dublin and Desmond Greaves in London were seen to be taking directions from the British communist party, the CPGB. The communists had their own Cold War agenda to follow, with ‘world peace’ Moscow’s priority. But this issue did not capture the imagination of the working class, as a frustrated Roy Johnston discovered. Nevertheless, orders were orders for Ireland’s ‘fifth column’. Some communist-led organisations, however, were believed to have recruitment potential. Could the CPGB-directed Connolly Association, and its equivalent in New York – both ‘dangerous’ in Bryan’s view – convert Irish exiles by highlighting issues related to Northern Ireland? Was there any possibility that communists could succeed in infiltrating the Irish republican movement?...
结论
“军事中立”和“政治中立”不是一回事。爱尔兰当局不允许国家的不结盟地位阻止他们加入西方反对共产主义的十字军东征。他们有冷战议程。上世纪50年代,爱尔兰陆军情报局(G2)的丹•布莱恩上校(col . Dan Bryan)等高层官员认为,爱尔兰应该在全球斗争中协助北约(NATO)大国。都柏林的司法部部长彼得·贝里(Peter Berry)也是如此。例如,他们向“极度敏感”的美国人提供了这个小小的共产主义组织的详细信息,并向英国人提供了有关“和平”活动人士的情报。有关可疑活动人士的细节最终被记录在教会“警戒”委员会的档案中——这显然违反了政教分离的原则。作为贝里所称的“共产国际”的工作人员,都柏林的迈克尔·奥赖尔登和伦敦的德斯蒙德·格里夫斯被认为是听从英国共产党CPGB的指示。共产党人有自己的冷战议程要遵循,莫斯科把“世界和平”放在首位。但正如沮丧的罗伊·约翰斯顿所发现的那样,这个问题并没有引起工人阶级的想象。然而,命令是对爱尔兰“第五纵队”的命令。然而,一些共产党领导的组织被认为具有招募潜力。cpgb领导的康诺利协会和它在纽约的同类组织——在布莱恩看来都是“危险的”——能通过强调与北爱尔兰有关的问题来改变爱尔兰流亡者的信仰吗?共产主义者是否有可能成功地渗透进爱尔兰的共和运动?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信