Key challenges for the sociology of education: theoretical, methodological, and empirical issues

R. Becker
{"title":"Key challenges for the sociology of education: theoretical, methodological, and empirical issues","authors":"R. Becker","doi":"10.4337/9781788110426.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last 25 years, interest in the sociology of education has increased tremendously in social sciences research, but also in the politically interested public spheres. This is indicated by the flood of research projects and publications dealing with topics in sociology of education as well as the increased demand of politicians for scientific reports on education as a social question. Additionally, research institutes have been founded and professorships have been established which focus on research questions typical of modern sociology of education (Becker 2017). Furthermore, it is obvious that researchers in educational science, psychology, economics and political science are increasingly interested in research questions belonging to the domain of sociology of education. Examples are educational trajectories, individual decisions on investment in education, development of skills in an individual’s life course, policies regarding the educational system, and social inequality of educational opportunities (Solga and Becker 2012, p. 10; see in this volume: Blossfeld et al., Chapter 2; Erikson, Chapter 3; Weinert and Artelt, Chapter 7; Kriesi and Imdorf, Chapter 11; Birgit Becker, Chapter 13; Holtmann and Bernardi, Chapter 14; Dollmann, Chapter 15; Kleinert and Jacob, Chapter 16; Kogan, Chapter 18; Powell and Pfahl, Chapter 21; Lechner et al., Chapter 23; Hanushek and Woessmann, Chapter 25; and Nauck, Chapter 26). However, it has to be emphasized that sociology of education is not a novel science which analyses education (see in this volume: Hillmert, Chapter 5; Dominik Becker, Chapter 19) and educational systems from a sociological perspective (see in this volume: Skopek et al., Chapter 12; Neugebauer, Chapter 20). It has a long tradition which began around the end of the nineteenth and the early years of the twentieth century along with the establishment of sociology as an autonomous science. The establishment of the discipline also coincided with the institutionalization of the public educational system and mass education as a pivotal characteristic of the occidental project of modernization (Karabel and Halsey 1977; Arum and Beattie 2000). Therefore, one could assume that sociology of education is a sociological discipline – maybe a special field of sociology – providing a clearly defined subject and a wellestablished programmatic core of questions, theories and methods. Obviously, this is not the case. In sociology of education, we actually find a rich collection of different theoretical, methodological and empirical approaches (Solga and Becker 2012; Arum et al. 2010; Ballantine and Hammack 2008; Scott and Marshall 1998). Today, modern sociology of education is not monolithic but a broad research area with loosely defined boundaries, embedded in sociology with relations to other social sciences (Levinson et al. 2002; Hallinan 2000; Halsey et al. 1997; Richardson 1986). We find neither a coherent paradigm nor a unique research programme (Saha 1997). Like sociology itself, sociology","PeriodicalId":382463,"journal":{"name":"Research Handbook on the Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Handbook on the Sociology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788110426.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the last 25 years, interest in the sociology of education has increased tremendously in social sciences research, but also in the politically interested public spheres. This is indicated by the flood of research projects and publications dealing with topics in sociology of education as well as the increased demand of politicians for scientific reports on education as a social question. Additionally, research institutes have been founded and professorships have been established which focus on research questions typical of modern sociology of education (Becker 2017). Furthermore, it is obvious that researchers in educational science, psychology, economics and political science are increasingly interested in research questions belonging to the domain of sociology of education. Examples are educational trajectories, individual decisions on investment in education, development of skills in an individual’s life course, policies regarding the educational system, and social inequality of educational opportunities (Solga and Becker 2012, p. 10; see in this volume: Blossfeld et al., Chapter 2; Erikson, Chapter 3; Weinert and Artelt, Chapter 7; Kriesi and Imdorf, Chapter 11; Birgit Becker, Chapter 13; Holtmann and Bernardi, Chapter 14; Dollmann, Chapter 15; Kleinert and Jacob, Chapter 16; Kogan, Chapter 18; Powell and Pfahl, Chapter 21; Lechner et al., Chapter 23; Hanushek and Woessmann, Chapter 25; and Nauck, Chapter 26). However, it has to be emphasized that sociology of education is not a novel science which analyses education (see in this volume: Hillmert, Chapter 5; Dominik Becker, Chapter 19) and educational systems from a sociological perspective (see in this volume: Skopek et al., Chapter 12; Neugebauer, Chapter 20). It has a long tradition which began around the end of the nineteenth and the early years of the twentieth century along with the establishment of sociology as an autonomous science. The establishment of the discipline also coincided with the institutionalization of the public educational system and mass education as a pivotal characteristic of the occidental project of modernization (Karabel and Halsey 1977; Arum and Beattie 2000). Therefore, one could assume that sociology of education is a sociological discipline – maybe a special field of sociology – providing a clearly defined subject and a wellestablished programmatic core of questions, theories and methods. Obviously, this is not the case. In sociology of education, we actually find a rich collection of different theoretical, methodological and empirical approaches (Solga and Becker 2012; Arum et al. 2010; Ballantine and Hammack 2008; Scott and Marshall 1998). Today, modern sociology of education is not monolithic but a broad research area with loosely defined boundaries, embedded in sociology with relations to other social sciences (Levinson et al. 2002; Hallinan 2000; Halsey et al. 1997; Richardson 1986). We find neither a coherent paradigm nor a unique research programme (Saha 1997). Like sociology itself, sociology
教育社会学面临的主要挑战:理论、方法和经验问题
在过去的25年里,对教育社会学的兴趣在社会科学研究中有了极大的增长,而且在对政治感兴趣的公共领域也是如此。关于教育社会学的研究项目和出版物如潮水般涌来,政治家们对作为一个社会问题的教育的科学报告的需求也在增加,这些都表明了这一点。此外,还建立了研究机构,并设立了教授职位,重点研究现代教育社会学的典型研究问题(Becker 2017)。此外,很明显,教育科学、心理学、经济学和政治学的研究人员对属于教育社会学领域的研究问题越来越感兴趣。例如教育轨迹、个人对教育投资的决定、个人一生中技能的发展、有关教育制度的政策以及教育机会的社会不平等(Solga和Becker 2012,第10页;见本卷:Blossfeld et al.,第2章;埃里克森,第三章;韦纳特和阿特尔特,第七章;克里西和伊姆多夫,第11章;Birgit Becker,第13章;霍特曼和伯纳迪,第14章;《多尔曼》第十五章;克莱纳特和雅各布,第十六章;科根,第18章;鲍威尔和普法尔,第21章;Lechner等人,第23章;哈努谢克和沃斯曼,第25章;和Nauck,第26章)。然而,必须强调的是,教育社会学并不是一门分析教育的新科学(见本卷:Hillmert,第5章;多米尼克·贝克尔(Dominik Becker),第19章)和社会学视角下的教育系统(见本卷:Skopek et al.,第12章;纽格鲍尔,第20章)。它有着悠久的传统,始于19世纪末和20世纪初,随着社会学作为一门独立科学的建立。这门学科的建立也与公共教育体系的制度化和大众教育作为西方现代化项目的关键特征相吻合(Karabel and Halsey 1977;阿鲁姆和贝蒂2000)。因此,人们可以假设教育社会学是一门社会学学科——也许是社会学的一个特殊领域——提供了一个明确定义的学科和一个由问题、理论和方法组成的完善的纲论性核心。显然,事实并非如此。在教育社会学中,我们实际上发现了丰富的不同理论、方法和经验方法的集合(Solga和Becker 2012;Arum et al. 2010;Ballantine and Hammack 2008;Scott and Marshall 1998)。今天,现代教育社会学不是单一的,而是一个广泛的研究领域,边界定义松散,嵌入社会学与其他社会科学的关系(Levinson et al. 2002;Hallinan 2000;Halsey et al. 1997;理查森1986)。我们既没有找到连贯的范例,也没有找到独特的研究方案(Saha 1997)。比如社会学本身,社会学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信