A Comparative Analysis of Application of Niblack and Sauvola Binarization to Retinal Vessel Segmentation

M. Nandy, M. Banerjee
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Application of Niblack and Sauvola Binarization to Retinal Vessel Segmentation","authors":"M. Nandy, M. Banerjee","doi":"10.1109/CINE.2017.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper demonstrates a comparative analysis of two binarization techniques- Niblack and Sauvola algorithm in context with their applications to retinal vessel segmentation. Preprocessed images are applied with Niblack’s binarization. Sauvola’s binarization is also applied as modification to Niblack’s algorithm. Drawbacks of Sauvola algorithm are addressed by incorporating some changes in the original algorithm and by setting experimentally the value of its Dynamic Range and the constant k in an application oriented way. Some post processing steps are needed to get rid of background noise pixels, The result is compared with the ground truth images of DRIVE database. The method achieves 93.23% accuracy in case of Niblack’s algorithm application and 93.31% (without post processing) and 94.34% (with post processing) accuracy in case of Sauvola algorithm. The accuracy obtained is very encouraging as far as the simplicity of the method is concerned.","PeriodicalId":236972,"journal":{"name":"2017 3rd International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Networks (CINE)","volume":"60 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 3rd International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Networks (CINE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CINE.2017.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper demonstrates a comparative analysis of two binarization techniques- Niblack and Sauvola algorithm in context with their applications to retinal vessel segmentation. Preprocessed images are applied with Niblack’s binarization. Sauvola’s binarization is also applied as modification to Niblack’s algorithm. Drawbacks of Sauvola algorithm are addressed by incorporating some changes in the original algorithm and by setting experimentally the value of its Dynamic Range and the constant k in an application oriented way. Some post processing steps are needed to get rid of background noise pixels, The result is compared with the ground truth images of DRIVE database. The method achieves 93.23% accuracy in case of Niblack’s algorithm application and 93.31% (without post processing) and 94.34% (with post processing) accuracy in case of Sauvola algorithm. The accuracy obtained is very encouraging as far as the simplicity of the method is concerned.
Niblack二值化与Sauvola二值化在视网膜血管分割中的应用对比分析
本文对Niblack和Sauvola二值化算法在视网膜血管分割中的应用进行了比较分析。对预处理后的图像进行Niblack二值化。并将Sauvola二值化方法作为Niblack算法的改进。针对Sauvola算法的不足,通过对原算法进行一些修改,并以面向应用的方式,通过实验设置其动态范围和常数k的值。对图像进行后期处理,去除背景噪声像素,并与DRIVE数据库的地面真实图像进行比较。该方法在应用Niblack算法时准确率达到93.23%,在使用Sauvola算法时准确率分别为93.31%(未进行后处理)和94.34%(进行后处理)。就该方法的简单性而言,所获得的准确性是非常令人鼓舞的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信