Brazil and the Fight Against Covid-19

G. M. Rodrigues, Vanessa Elias de Oliveira, Marcelo Labanca Corrêa de Araújo, S. Ferrari
{"title":"Brazil and the Fight Against Covid-19","authors":"G. M. Rodrigues, Vanessa Elias de Oliveira, Marcelo Labanca Corrêa de Araújo, S. Ferrari","doi":"10.4324/9781003166771-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses the dual nature of Brazilian federalism and the strengthening of subnational autonomy, as evidenced during the Covid-19 pandemic. On one hand, the crisis highlighted the importance of the federal government in the institutional arrangement of Brazilian federalism, which is highly centralised;on the other, it has provided greater scope for action by state governments, whose political power has gradually diminished over the 30 years since the 1988 Constitution came into being. Municipalities have also played a stronger role based on their local interest. To analyse those aspects, the chapter presents the constitutional design of the Brazilian federation and the public policies in health and disaster management to contain the pandemic, demonstrating that the intergovernmental relations generated by the very nature of federalism were indispensable in enabling Brazil to address the pandemic and so prevent worse outcomes in terms of public health. Additionally, the expanded autonomy of states and municipalities during the pandemic, due to a Supreme Court decision, was fundamental to the struggle against the denialism of the President Jair Bolsonaro, who neglected his federal responsibilities. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Nico Steytler.","PeriodicalId":130880,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Federalism and Covid-19","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Federalism and Covid-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003166771-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This chapter discusses the dual nature of Brazilian federalism and the strengthening of subnational autonomy, as evidenced during the Covid-19 pandemic. On one hand, the crisis highlighted the importance of the federal government in the institutional arrangement of Brazilian federalism, which is highly centralised;on the other, it has provided greater scope for action by state governments, whose political power has gradually diminished over the 30 years since the 1988 Constitution came into being. Municipalities have also played a stronger role based on their local interest. To analyse those aspects, the chapter presents the constitutional design of the Brazilian federation and the public policies in health and disaster management to contain the pandemic, demonstrating that the intergovernmental relations generated by the very nature of federalism were indispensable in enabling Brazil to address the pandemic and so prevent worse outcomes in terms of public health. Additionally, the expanded autonomy of states and municipalities during the pandemic, due to a Supreme Court decision, was fundamental to the struggle against the denialism of the President Jair Bolsonaro, who neglected his federal responsibilities. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Nico Steytler.
巴西与抗疫斗争
本章讨论了巴西联邦制和加强地方自治的双重性质,这在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间得到了证明。一方面,这场危机凸显了联邦政府在高度集权的巴西联邦制制度安排中的重要性;另一方面,它也为州政府提供了更大的行动空间,自1988年宪法形成以来的30年里,州政府的政治权力逐渐减弱。市政当局也在地方利益的基础上发挥了更大的作用。为了分析这些方面,本章介绍了巴西联邦的宪法设计以及卫生和灾害管理方面的公共政策,以遏制这一流行病,并表明联邦制本身所产生的政府间关系对于使巴西能够应对这一流行病,从而防止在公共卫生方面出现更糟的结果是不可或缺的。此外,由于最高法院的裁决,在大流行期间扩大了各州和直辖市的自主权,这对于反对贾尔·博尔索纳罗总统忽视联邦责任的否认主义的斗争至关重要。©2022选择和编辑事项,Nico Steytler。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信