A comparison of known codes, random codes, and the best codes

S. MacMullan, O. Collins
{"title":"A comparison of known codes, random codes, and the best codes","authors":"S. MacMullan, O. Collins","doi":"10.1109/ISIT.1998.708819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper calculates new bounds on the size of the performance gap between random codes and the best possible codes on the binary symmetric channel (BSC), binary erasure channel (BEC), and the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel. The paper also presents substantial numerical evaluation of the performance of random codes and existing standard lower bounds for the BEC, BSC, and the AWGN channel. These results provide a useful standard against which to measure many popular codes including turbo codes, e.g., there exist turbo codes that perform within 0.6 dB of the bounds over a wide range of block lengths.","PeriodicalId":133728,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (Cat. No.98CH36252)","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (Cat. No.98CH36252)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.1998.708819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

This paper calculates new bounds on the size of the performance gap between random codes and the best possible codes on the binary symmetric channel (BSC), binary erasure channel (BEC), and the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel. The paper also presents substantial numerical evaluation of the performance of random codes and existing standard lower bounds for the BEC, BSC, and the AWGN channel. These results provide a useful standard against which to measure many popular codes including turbo codes, e.g., there exist turbo codes that perform within 0.6 dB of the bounds over a wide range of block lengths.
已知代码、随机代码和最佳代码的比较
本文计算了在二进制对称信道(BSC)、二进制擦除信道(BEC)和加性高斯白噪声信道(AWGN)上随机码与最佳可能码之间性能差距大小的新界限。本文还对随机码的性能和现有的BEC、BSC和AWGN信道的标准下界进行了大量的数值评价。这些结果提供了一个有用的标准,用于测量许多流行的代码,包括涡轮码,例如,存在在宽范围的块长度范围内执行0.6 dB范围内的涡轮码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信