Deep perceptual similarity and Quality Assessment

Alireza Khatami, Ahmad Mahmoudi-Aznaveh
{"title":"Deep perceptual similarity and Quality Assessment","authors":"Alireza Khatami, Ahmad Mahmoudi-Aznaveh","doi":"10.1109/IPRIA59240.2023.10147170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measuring the perceptual similarity between two images is a long-standing problem. This assessment should mimic human judgments. Considering the complexity of the human visual system, it is challenging to model human perception. On the other hand, the recent low-level vision task approaches, mostly based on supervised deep learning, require an appropriate loss for the backward pass. The per-pixel loss, such as MSE and MAE, between the output of the network and the ground-truth images were among the first choices. More complicated and common similarity measures in which the error is computed in a hand-designed feature space are also employed. Furthermore, Deep Perceptual Similarity (DPS) metrics, where the similarity is measured in the deep feature space, also have promising results. This feature can be selected from a pre-trained or optimized model for the task at hand. Recently many studies have been conducted to thoroughly investigate DPS. In this research, we provide an in-depth analysis of the pros and cons of DPS in assessing the full reference quality assessment. In addition, to compare different similarity measures, we propose a metric which aggregates various desired factors. Based on our experiment, it can be concluded that perceptual similarity is not directly related to classification accuracy. It is discovered that the outliers mostly contain high-frequency elements. The code and complete outcomes described in results, can be found on: https://github.com/Alireza-Khatami/PerceptualQuality","PeriodicalId":109390,"journal":{"name":"2023 6th International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis (IPRIA)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 6th International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis (IPRIA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPRIA59240.2023.10147170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measuring the perceptual similarity between two images is a long-standing problem. This assessment should mimic human judgments. Considering the complexity of the human visual system, it is challenging to model human perception. On the other hand, the recent low-level vision task approaches, mostly based on supervised deep learning, require an appropriate loss for the backward pass. The per-pixel loss, such as MSE and MAE, between the output of the network and the ground-truth images were among the first choices. More complicated and common similarity measures in which the error is computed in a hand-designed feature space are also employed. Furthermore, Deep Perceptual Similarity (DPS) metrics, where the similarity is measured in the deep feature space, also have promising results. This feature can be selected from a pre-trained or optimized model for the task at hand. Recently many studies have been conducted to thoroughly investigate DPS. In this research, we provide an in-depth analysis of the pros and cons of DPS in assessing the full reference quality assessment. In addition, to compare different similarity measures, we propose a metric which aggregates various desired factors. Based on our experiment, it can be concluded that perceptual similarity is not directly related to classification accuracy. It is discovered that the outliers mostly contain high-frequency elements. The code and complete outcomes described in results, can be found on: https://github.com/Alireza-Khatami/PerceptualQuality
深度感知相似度与质量评价
测量两幅图像之间的感知相似性是一个长期存在的问题。这种评估应该模仿人类的判断。考虑到人类视觉系统的复杂性,对人类感知进行建模是一项挑战。另一方面,最近的低层次视觉任务方法,主要基于监督深度学习,需要对向后传递进行适当的损失。网络输出和真实图像之间的每像素损失(如MSE和MAE)是首选。更复杂和常见的相似度度量,其中误差是在手工设计的特征空间中计算的。此外,在深度特征空间中测量相似性的深度感知相似度(DPS)指标也有很好的结果。此特征可以从针对手头任务的预训练或优化模型中选择。最近进行了许多研究,以彻底调查DPS。在本研究中,我们深入分析了DPS在评估全参考文献质量评估中的利弊。此外,为了比较不同的相似性度量,我们提出了一个聚合各种期望因素的度量。根据我们的实验,可以得出感知相似度与分类准确率没有直接关系的结论。研究发现,异常值大多含有高频元素。结果中描述的代码和完整结果可以在https://github.com/Alireza-Khatami/PerceptualQuality上找到
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信