Evidence-based Nursing Practice in New York State: A Delphi Study

{"title":"Evidence-based Nursing Practice in New York State: A Delphi Study","authors":"","doi":"10.47988/janany.70647868.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Today’s landscape of population health, economics, and educational delivery methods have influenced the progress and implementation of nursing practice built on the best evidence. International literature has documented barriers to implementing and sustaining evidence-based practice (EBP).\n\nPurpose. The purposes of this study were to (a) identify barriers to implementing evidence into clinical practice in New York State (NYS), (b) prioritize resources needed to address these barriers, and (c) determine how the Cathryne A. Welch Center for Nursing (CNR) of the Foundation of NYS Nurses might provide support to address the identified barriers.\n\nMethodology. Using a modified Delphi technique, a sample of nurse leaders completed two online survey rounds. The first Round provided qualitative feedback, which was categorized via content analysis, with a second Round that asked respondents to rank the categories from Round I.\n\nResults. Organizational culture, productivity demands, and time were ranked as the top three barriers to implementing EBP in NYS. Time, leader support, and guidance/mentoring were identified as top resources needed\nto employ EBP. Respondents reported the CNR could facilitate EBP through financial support, communication, and mentoring. Data stratification revealed differences between rural and urban respondents, academic and clinical respondents, and geographical regions of the State, and differences in resources and support needed.\n\nConclusion. Findings confirm barriers for NYS nurses mirror those described in the literature. Resources and support needed, however, may be demographically specific. Awareness of these differences will enable the CNR to best support NYS nurses’ implementation of EBP across the State.\n\nMeSH Keywords: Nursing, Delphi Technique, Evidence-Based Practice, Barriers to EBP, Resources for EBP","PeriodicalId":192372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Nurses Association - New York","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Nurses Association - New York","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47988/janany.70647868.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Today’s landscape of population health, economics, and educational delivery methods have influenced the progress and implementation of nursing practice built on the best evidence. International literature has documented barriers to implementing and sustaining evidence-based practice (EBP). Purpose. The purposes of this study were to (a) identify barriers to implementing evidence into clinical practice in New York State (NYS), (b) prioritize resources needed to address these barriers, and (c) determine how the Cathryne A. Welch Center for Nursing (CNR) of the Foundation of NYS Nurses might provide support to address the identified barriers. Methodology. Using a modified Delphi technique, a sample of nurse leaders completed two online survey rounds. The first Round provided qualitative feedback, which was categorized via content analysis, with a second Round that asked respondents to rank the categories from Round I. Results. Organizational culture, productivity demands, and time were ranked as the top three barriers to implementing EBP in NYS. Time, leader support, and guidance/mentoring were identified as top resources needed to employ EBP. Respondents reported the CNR could facilitate EBP through financial support, communication, and mentoring. Data stratification revealed differences between rural and urban respondents, academic and clinical respondents, and geographical regions of the State, and differences in resources and support needed. Conclusion. Findings confirm barriers for NYS nurses mirror those described in the literature. Resources and support needed, however, may be demographically specific. Awareness of these differences will enable the CNR to best support NYS nurses’ implementation of EBP across the State. MeSH Keywords: Nursing, Delphi Technique, Evidence-Based Practice, Barriers to EBP, Resources for EBP
纽约州循证护理实践:德尔菲研究
背景。今天的人口健康、经济和教育提供方法的景观影响了基于最佳证据的护理实践的进展和实施。国际文献记录了实施和维持循证实践(EBP)的障碍。本研究的目的是(a)确定在纽约州(NYS)临床实践中实施证据的障碍,(b)优先考虑解决这些障碍所需的资源,以及(c)确定纽约州护士基金会的凯瑟琳·a·韦尔奇护理中心(CNR)如何提供支持以解决已确定的障碍。使用改进的德尔菲技术,护士领导样本完成了两轮在线调查。第一轮提供定性反馈,通过内容分析进行分类,第二轮要求受访者对第一轮结果中的类别进行排名。组织文化、生产力需求和时间被列为在纽约州实施EBP的三大障碍。时间、领导支持和指导/指导被确定为使用EBP所需的首要资源。受访者表示,中国北方铁路可以通过财政支持、沟通和指导来促进EBP。数据分层揭示了农村和城市受访者、学术和临床受访者、国家地理区域之间的差异,以及所需资源和支持的差异。研究结果证实,纽约护士的障碍反映了文献中描述的障碍。然而,所需的资源和支助可能因人口而异。对这些差异的认识将使CNR能够最好地支持纽约州护士在全州实施EBP。关键词:护理,德尔菲技术,循证实践,EBP障碍,EBP资源
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信