Should Europeans fear the privatisation of pensions?

Mark S. Hyde, A. Barton, Suzanne Farrar, Jonathan D. Moizer
{"title":"Should Europeans fear the privatisation of pensions?","authors":"Mark S. Hyde, A. Barton, Suzanne Farrar, Jonathan D. Moizer","doi":"10.1080/17486831.2012.655983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many Europeans fear proposals to privatise their public pension arrangements. They believe that privatisation is necessarily informed by the classical liberal free market model, which, if imported to Europe, would prove to be incompatible with social cohesion and distributive justice. In endorsing privatisation, this article responds to these fears in two ways. First we examine several of the arguments upon which public pensions are premised, and find that they are flawed. Second, drawing upon our own extensive research, we find that several features of mandated private pensions can be compatible with the requirements of the public interest, defined in terms of collectivist values. Provided that they are appropriately designed and regulated, mandated private pensions are a viable alternative to publicly administered retirement income protection. In view of these arguments, Europeans should not fear all privatisation.","PeriodicalId":270572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Social Welfare","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17486831.2012.655983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Many Europeans fear proposals to privatise their public pension arrangements. They believe that privatisation is necessarily informed by the classical liberal free market model, which, if imported to Europe, would prove to be incompatible with social cohesion and distributive justice. In endorsing privatisation, this article responds to these fears in two ways. First we examine several of the arguments upon which public pensions are premised, and find that they are flawed. Second, drawing upon our own extensive research, we find that several features of mandated private pensions can be compatible with the requirements of the public interest, defined in terms of collectivist values. Provided that they are appropriately designed and regulated, mandated private pensions are a viable alternative to publicly administered retirement income protection. In view of these arguments, Europeans should not fear all privatisation.
欧洲人应该担心养老金私有化吗?
许多欧洲人担心公共养老金私有化的提议。他们认为,私有化必然受到古典自由主义自由市场模式的影响,而这种模式如果传入欧洲,将被证明与社会凝聚力和分配正义是不相容的。通过支持私有化,本文从两个方面回应了这些担忧。首先,我们检查了公共养老金的几个前提论点,并发现它们是有缺陷的。其次,根据我们自己的广泛研究,我们发现强制性私人养老金的几个特征可以与集体主义价值观所定义的公共利益的要求相一致。只要设计和管理得当,强制性私人养恤金是公共管理的退休收入保障之外的可行选择。鉴于这些观点,欧洲人不应该害怕所有的私有化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信