Implementation of Health Promoting Hospital in Government and Private Indonesian Hospitals: Is There Any Difference?

E. Rachmawati, Sarah Handayani, Yuniar Dwi Putri, Gabriela Luftania Rivai
{"title":"Implementation of Health Promoting Hospital in Government and Private Indonesian Hospitals: Is There Any Difference?","authors":"E. Rachmawati, Sarah Handayani, Yuniar Dwi Putri, Gabriela Luftania Rivai","doi":"10.5220/0010758200003235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Health promotion in hospitals (HPH) has been a challenge for hospital regarding the reorientation of health services. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of HPH in government and private hospitals in Jakarta, Indonesia. A cross-sectional study was conducted through a survey and self-assessment tools involving 223 hospital employees, using proportional random sampling and bivariate analysis (α= 0.05). The results showed that employees in both hospitals (government and private) had good knowledge towards HPH (74.8% and 76.9%). However, the participation of the employees was poor in HPH training (20.9% and 10.2%), as well as in HPH-related activities (45.2% and 25.9%). The proportion of employee with good attitude towards HPH in the government hospital (77.4%) was higher than in the private hospital (51.9%), and was significantly different (p= 0.006). The HPH national standard for both type of hospital had not been well achieved (52.2% and 52.8%), and no significantly different. However, the implementation of standard 2, 3, and 4 of HPH showed the significantly different, but not for standard 1 (“the hospitals have health promotion regulations”). The management in both hospitals should enforce the socialization, activeness, and HPH training for employees to improve the achievement of HPH standards.","PeriodicalId":153750,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Determinants of Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Determinants of Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0010758200003235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Health promotion in hospitals (HPH) has been a challenge for hospital regarding the reorientation of health services. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of HPH in government and private hospitals in Jakarta, Indonesia. A cross-sectional study was conducted through a survey and self-assessment tools involving 223 hospital employees, using proportional random sampling and bivariate analysis (α= 0.05). The results showed that employees in both hospitals (government and private) had good knowledge towards HPH (74.8% and 76.9%). However, the participation of the employees was poor in HPH training (20.9% and 10.2%), as well as in HPH-related activities (45.2% and 25.9%). The proportion of employee with good attitude towards HPH in the government hospital (77.4%) was higher than in the private hospital (51.9%), and was significantly different (p= 0.006). The HPH national standard for both type of hospital had not been well achieved (52.2% and 52.8%), and no significantly different. However, the implementation of standard 2, 3, and 4 of HPH showed the significantly different, but not for standard 1 (“the hospitals have health promotion regulations”). The management in both hospitals should enforce the socialization, activeness, and HPH training for employees to improve the achievement of HPH standards.
印尼公立医院与私立医院健康促进医院的实施:有何区别?
医院健康促进(HPH)是医院在调整保健服务方向方面面临的一项挑战。本研究旨在评估HPH在印尼雅加达的政府和私立医院的实施情况。采用问卷调查和自评工具对223名医院职工进行横断面研究,采用比例随机抽样和双变量分析(α= 0.05)。结果显示,公立医院和私立医院员工对HPH的了解程度分别为74.8%和76.9%。然而,员工在HPH培训(20.9%和10.2%)以及HPH相关活动(45.2%和25.9%)的参与度较低。公立医院员工对HPH持良好态度的比例(77.4%)高于私立医院(51.9%),差异有统计学意义(p= 0.006)。两类医院的HPH均未达到国家标准(52.2%和52.8%),差异无统计学意义。然而,HPH标准2、3、4的执行情况存在显著差异,而标准1(“医院有健康促进条例”)的执行情况不存在显著差异。两家医院的管理层应加强员工的社会化、主动性和健康卫生培训,以提高健康卫生标准的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信