Dynamic synergy analysis in international business: the concept and application to two players China and Russia

M.S.S. El-Namaki
{"title":"Dynamic synergy analysis in international business: the concept and application to two players China and Russia","authors":"M.S.S. El-Namaki","doi":"10.19085/JOURNAL.SIJMD030702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two ways to conduct economic, and possibly political, business between countries. The first is conventional search for country present day competitive advantage (Porter, 1990). Yet competitive advantage is transient, not sustainable (Forbes, 2.6.2013). And competitive advantage could relate to yesterday’s industries not today’s arenas. A more plausible search is that for strategic synergy or a situation where the two countries whole is greater than the sum of individual country parts. The later, the synergy route, places emphasis on strategic longer term complementarity or synergy between the two countries rather than a transient advantage. The following article addresses the second scenario. It projects a model for the identification of the term driving forces of two economies, tracing their respective future synergies and deriving synergy-rooted strategies. The article goes on to apply the model to two countries: China and Russia, being contemporary illustrations of a largely politically driven search for economic synergy. The model could have conceptual as well as applied dimensions. Conceptually, it provides a theoretical framework for present day international business concepts. Operationally it could lead to specific strategies, and venues, for economic and business engagement between countries.","PeriodicalId":431805,"journal":{"name":"Scholedge International Journal of Management & Development","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholedge International Journal of Management & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19085/JOURNAL.SIJMD030702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

There are two ways to conduct economic, and possibly political, business between countries. The first is conventional search for country present day competitive advantage (Porter, 1990). Yet competitive advantage is transient, not sustainable (Forbes, 2.6.2013). And competitive advantage could relate to yesterday’s industries not today’s arenas. A more plausible search is that for strategic synergy or a situation where the two countries whole is greater than the sum of individual country parts. The later, the synergy route, places emphasis on strategic longer term complementarity or synergy between the two countries rather than a transient advantage. The following article addresses the second scenario. It projects a model for the identification of the term driving forces of two economies, tracing their respective future synergies and deriving synergy-rooted strategies. The article goes on to apply the model to two countries: China and Russia, being contemporary illustrations of a largely politically driven search for economic synergy. The model could have conceptual as well as applied dimensions. Conceptually, it provides a theoretical framework for present day international business concepts. Operationally it could lead to specific strategies, and venues, for economic and business engagement between countries.
国际商务中的动态协同分析:概念及其在中国和俄罗斯两个参与者中的应用
有两种方式可以在国家之间进行经济往来,可能还有政治往来。第一个是对国家当前竞争优势的常规搜索(波特,1990)。然而,竞争优势是短暂的,不可持续的(Forbes, 2.6.2013)。竞争优势可能与过去的行业有关,而不是与今天的领域有关。一个更合理的搜索是战略协同作用,或者两国整体大于个别国家部分之和的情况。后者,即协同路线,强调两国之间长期的战略互补或协同,而不是短暂的优势。下面的文章将讨论第二种情况。它预测了一个模型,用于识别两个经济体的长期驱动力,追踪它们各自未来的协同效应,并得出基于协同效应的战略。文章接着将这一模型应用到两个国家:中国和俄罗斯,这两个国家在很大程度上是政治驱动下寻求经济协同的当代例证。模型可以具有概念维度,也可以具有应用维度。从概念上讲,它为当今国际商业概念提供了一个理论框架。在操作上,它可以为国家之间的经济和商业接触带来具体的战略和场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信