A Review of the e-Government Maturity Models: Are They Still Relevant?

Z. Patergiannaki, Y. Pollalis
{"title":"A Review of the e-Government Maturity Models: Are They Still Relevant?","authors":"Z. Patergiannaki, Y. Pollalis","doi":"10.12681/jpentai.30872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past, a number of methodologies and approaches have been created to evaluate the development of e-Government and the public sector's digital transformation. Numerous e-Government maturity models have been created to close this gap. The variety of models, though, has come under criticism from several academics. The purpose of this research is to examine whether e-Government maturity models can still be regarded as relevant through the examination of 39 e-Government maturity models that have been established throughout the year. The results indicate that due to the numerous internal and external relevant inflectional factors that have not been taken into consideration by the models under study, e-Government maturity models have a limited ability to represent the growth of e-Government.","PeriodicalId":436908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Politics and Ethics in New Technologies and AI","volume":"23 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Politics and Ethics in New Technologies and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/jpentai.30872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the past, a number of methodologies and approaches have been created to evaluate the development of e-Government and the public sector's digital transformation. Numerous e-Government maturity models have been created to close this gap. The variety of models, though, has come under criticism from several academics. The purpose of this research is to examine whether e-Government maturity models can still be regarded as relevant through the examination of 39 e-Government maturity models that have been established throughout the year. The results indicate that due to the numerous internal and external relevant inflectional factors that have not been taken into consideration by the models under study, e-Government maturity models have a limited ability to represent the growth of e-Government.
电子政务成熟度模型述评:它们是否仍然适用?
过去,已经创建了许多方法和方法来评估电子政务的发展和公共部门的数字化转型。为了缩小这一差距,已经创建了许多电子政务成熟度模型。然而,各种各样的模型受到了一些学者的批评。本研究的目的是通过对全年已建立的39个电子政务成熟度模型的检验,来检验电子政务成熟度模型是否仍然具有相关性。研究结果表明,由于所研究的模型没有考虑到许多内部和外部的相关曲折因素,电子政务成熟度模型对电子政务成长的表征能力有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信