Differences in the delivery of the corner in a baby who was bathed in warm water with a baby whipped in a wet tool at batara siang hospital of Pangkep District

H. Herman
{"title":"Differences in the delivery of the corner in a baby who was bathed in warm water with a baby whipped in a wet tool at batara siang hospital of Pangkep District","authors":"H. Herman","doi":"10.29103/ijevs.v3i4.5902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"WHO (2000), recommends umbilical cord care based on aseptic and dry principles and no longer recommended to use alcohol but with open care. The umbilical cord should also not be tightly closed with anything, because it will make it moist. In addition to slowing the release of the umbilical cord, it also poses a risk of infection. Even if you have to close. according to Taylor (2003, dalam Nopriyarti, 2013) cover or tie loosely at the top of the umbilical cord with sterile gauze. The research used quasi-experimental research. The design of this study used the Experimental Design- Equivalent Time Sample method, which is a quasi-experimental design by treating the experimental group (X1), namely taking a warm bath and the control group (X0), which was wiped with a wet towel, alternately with random determination (Suharsaputra, 2012). The mandatory output in this research is publishing international journals, while the additional output is publishing national journals it can be seen that the average length of umbilical cord detachment of infants who were bathed in warm water (experimental group) was 110.8 hours, while the average length of time to release the umbilical cord of infants who were wiped with a wet towel (control group) was 76.9 hours or 6.6 days. The average difference between the two groups is 24,72 hours. The results of the statistical test obtained a P-value (<0.001), meaning that at alpha 5% there was a significant difference in the average length of umbilical cord detachment between babies who were wiped with a wet towel, which was 2.01 days and babies who were bathed in warm water, which was 4,01 day. So that the treatment of babies who are wiped with a wet towel is more effective and the umbilical cord is removed faster than the care of babies who are bathed in warm water. There was a significant difference between the In umbilical cord care, there was a significant difference in the average length of umbilical cord detachment between babies who were wiped with a wet towel and babies who were bathed in warm water.","PeriodicalId":332848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v3i4.5902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

WHO (2000), recommends umbilical cord care based on aseptic and dry principles and no longer recommended to use alcohol but with open care. The umbilical cord should also not be tightly closed with anything, because it will make it moist. In addition to slowing the release of the umbilical cord, it also poses a risk of infection. Even if you have to close. according to Taylor (2003, dalam Nopriyarti, 2013) cover or tie loosely at the top of the umbilical cord with sterile gauze. The research used quasi-experimental research. The design of this study used the Experimental Design- Equivalent Time Sample method, which is a quasi-experimental design by treating the experimental group (X1), namely taking a warm bath and the control group (X0), which was wiped with a wet towel, alternately with random determination (Suharsaputra, 2012). The mandatory output in this research is publishing international journals, while the additional output is publishing national journals it can be seen that the average length of umbilical cord detachment of infants who were bathed in warm water (experimental group) was 110.8 hours, while the average length of time to release the umbilical cord of infants who were wiped with a wet towel (control group) was 76.9 hours or 6.6 days. The average difference between the two groups is 24,72 hours. The results of the statistical test obtained a P-value (<0.001), meaning that at alpha 5% there was a significant difference in the average length of umbilical cord detachment between babies who were wiped with a wet towel, which was 2.01 days and babies who were bathed in warm water, which was 4,01 day. So that the treatment of babies who are wiped with a wet towel is more effective and the umbilical cord is removed faster than the care of babies who are bathed in warm water. There was a significant difference between the In umbilical cord care, there was a significant difference in the average length of umbilical cord detachment between babies who were wiped with a wet towel and babies who were bathed in warm water.
在庞克区巴塔拉祥医院,一名婴儿在温水中洗澡,另一名婴儿在湿工具中鞭打,分娩时的差异
世卫组织(2000年)建议根据无菌和干燥原则进行脐带护理,不再建议使用酒精,而是开放式护理。脐带也不应该用任何东西紧紧地闭合,因为它会使脐带潮湿。除了减缓脐带的释放,它还会带来感染的风险。即使你不得不关闭。根据Taylor (2003, dalam Nopriyarti, 2013)的说法,用无菌纱布覆盖或松散地绑在脐带的顶部。本研究采用准实验研究。本研究的设计采用实验设计-等效时间样本法,是一种准实验设计,实验组(X1)即洗热水澡,对照组(X0)用湿毛巾擦拭,交替随机测定(Suharsaputra, 2012)。本研究的强制输出为发表国际期刊,附加输出为发表国内期刊。可以看出,温水沐浴婴儿(实验组)脐带分离的平均长度为110.8小时,而湿毛巾擦拭婴儿(对照组)脐带分离的平均时间为76.9小时,即6.6天。两组之间的平均差异是24或72小时。统计检验的结果获得p值(<0.001),即在alpha 5%的情况下,用湿毛巾擦拭婴儿的平均脐带脱离长度为2.01天,用温水沐浴婴儿的平均脐带脱离长度为4,01天,差异有统计学意义。因此,用湿毛巾擦拭婴儿的治疗比用温水洗澡的婴儿的护理更有效,脐带的去除速度更快。在脐带护理方面,用湿毛巾擦拭婴儿和用温水沐浴婴儿的脐带平均脱离长度有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信