Evolution of Theoretical Approaches and Ways to Ensure the Responsibility of University Research Activities in the Context of Implementing the “Open Science” Concept

O. Petroye
{"title":"Evolution of Theoretical Approaches and Ways to Ensure the Responsibility of University Research Activities in the Context of Implementing the “Open Science” Concept","authors":"O. Petroye","doi":"10.31874/2520-6702-2023-15-54-65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to highlighting of the evolution of theoretical approaches and identification of ways to ensure the responsibility of university research activities in the context of the implementation of the Open Science concept. The author analyses the EU policy documents in the field of Responsible Research and Innovation and Open Science, and justifies the need to strengthen the responsibility of university research activities in the context of implementation of Open Science standards in the national research space to fulfil the tasks set out in the National Open Science Plan. The author considers the results of case studies of domestic and foreign, primarily European, scholars and shows that a characteristic feature of the current evolutionary stage of theoretical interpretations of the problem of responsibility of research activity is its development within the framework of the RRI concept, which is considered in the EU as a transformational, critical and radical concept. The author substantiates the expediency of applying the systemic RRI concept for the formation and implementation of policies to strengthen the responsibility of research activities of Ukrainian universities. The author highlights the advantages of this concept, which are that it combines academic procedural and political approaches to RRI, covers the key components of RRI (public engagement, open access, science education, gender, ethics and governance), and provides for the assessment of RRI conditions and processes (expectations, reflexivity, inclusion and sensitivity). \nThe author focuses special attention on highlighting the “Societal Readiness Thinking Tool” regarding the use of its potential to promote the RRI concept, formulate and actively implement RRI policies in Ukrainian HEIs to ensure their integration into the ERA of responsible research and open science. \nThis article is based on the results of the author’s previous research, which were obtained within the framework of the academic research of the Universities’ Research Activities Unit at the Institute of Higher Education of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine on the topic “Increasing the Research Capacity of Ukrainian Universities in the Conditions of War and Post-war Recovery in the Context of Implementing the Open Science Concept” (State Registration No. 0122U200775).","PeriodicalId":150572,"journal":{"name":"International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31874/2520-6702-2023-15-54-65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to highlighting of the evolution of theoretical approaches and identification of ways to ensure the responsibility of university research activities in the context of the implementation of the Open Science concept. The author analyses the EU policy documents in the field of Responsible Research and Innovation and Open Science, and justifies the need to strengthen the responsibility of university research activities in the context of implementation of Open Science standards in the national research space to fulfil the tasks set out in the National Open Science Plan. The author considers the results of case studies of domestic and foreign, primarily European, scholars and shows that a characteristic feature of the current evolutionary stage of theoretical interpretations of the problem of responsibility of research activity is its development within the framework of the RRI concept, which is considered in the EU as a transformational, critical and radical concept. The author substantiates the expediency of applying the systemic RRI concept for the formation and implementation of policies to strengthen the responsibility of research activities of Ukrainian universities. The author highlights the advantages of this concept, which are that it combines academic procedural and political approaches to RRI, covers the key components of RRI (public engagement, open access, science education, gender, ethics and governance), and provides for the assessment of RRI conditions and processes (expectations, reflexivity, inclusion and sensitivity). The author focuses special attention on highlighting the “Societal Readiness Thinking Tool” regarding the use of its potential to promote the RRI concept, formulate and actively implement RRI policies in Ukrainian HEIs to ensure their integration into the ERA of responsible research and open science. This article is based on the results of the author’s previous research, which were obtained within the framework of the academic research of the Universities’ Research Activities Unit at the Institute of Higher Education of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine on the topic “Increasing the Research Capacity of Ukrainian Universities in the Conditions of War and Post-war Recovery in the Context of Implementing the Open Science Concept” (State Registration No. 0122U200775).
实施“开放科学”理念背景下大学科研活动责任保障的理论途径与途径演变
本文致力于强调理论方法的演变,并确定在实施开放科学概念的背景下确保大学研究活动责任的方法。作者分析了欧盟在负责任的研究与创新和开放科学领域的政策文件,并论证了在国家研究空间实施开放科学标准的背景下,加强大学研究活动责任的必要性,以完成国家开放科学计划中提出的任务。作者考虑了国内外(主要是欧洲)学者的案例研究结果,并表明,研究活动责任问题的理论解释当前演化阶段的一个特征是其在研究活动责任概念框架内的发展,研究活动责任概念在欧盟被认为是一个转型的、批判性的和激进的概念。作者论证了在制定和实施加强乌克兰大学研究活动责任的政策时,应用系统性研究成果分配概念的权宜之计。作者强调了这一概念的优势,即它结合了RRI的学术程序和政治方法,涵盖了RRI的关键组成部分(公众参与、开放获取、科学教育、性别、道德和治理),并提供了RRI条件和过程的评估(期望、反思性、包容性和敏感性)。作者特别关注强调“社会准备思维工具”,即利用其潜力促进RRI概念,制定并积极实施乌克兰高等院校的RRI政策,以确保它们融入负责任的研究和开放科学的时代。本文基于作者之前的研究成果,该研究成果是在乌克兰国家教育科学院高等教育研究所大学研究活动单位的学术研究框架内获得的,主题是“在实施开放科学概念的背景下提高乌克兰大学在战争和战后恢复条件下的研究能力”(国家注册号0122U200775)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信