Exploring Myths in Digital Forensics: Separating Science From Ritual

G. Kessler, Gregory H. Carlton
{"title":"Exploring Myths in Digital Forensics: Separating Science From Ritual","authors":"G. Kessler, Gregory H. Carlton","doi":"10.4018/IJITN.2017100101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital forensic methodology deviates significantly relative to the methods of other forensic sciences for numerous practical reasons, and it has been largely influenced by factors derived from the inception and evolution of this relatively new and rapidly changing field. Digital forensics methodology was developed more by practitioners in its early days rather than by computer scientists. This led to accepted best practices in the field that may not represent the best or, at least, tested, science. This paper explores some of these differences in the practice and evolution between digital and other forensic sciences, and recommends scientific approaches to apply to many digital forensic practice rituals.","PeriodicalId":120331,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Interdiscip. Telecommun. Netw.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Interdiscip. Telecommun. Netw.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJITN.2017100101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital forensic methodology deviates significantly relative to the methods of other forensic sciences for numerous practical reasons, and it has been largely influenced by factors derived from the inception and evolution of this relatively new and rapidly changing field. Digital forensics methodology was developed more by practitioners in its early days rather than by computer scientists. This led to accepted best practices in the field that may not represent the best or, at least, tested, science. This paper explores some of these differences in the practice and evolution between digital and other forensic sciences, and recommends scientific approaches to apply to many digital forensic practice rituals.
探索数字取证中的神话:从仪式中分离科学
由于许多实际原因,数字法医方法论相对于其他法医科学的方法有很大的偏差,并且它在很大程度上受到这个相对较新的和快速变化的领域的开始和发展所产生的因素的影响。数字取证方法在早期更多是由从业人员而不是计算机科学家开发的。这导致了该领域公认的最佳实践,而这些实践可能并不代表最好的,或者至少是经过测试的科学。本文探讨了数字和其他法医科学在实践和发展中的一些差异,并推荐了适用于许多数字法医实践仪式的科学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信