The Applicability of International Humanitarian Law and the Law of Neutrality to the Kosovo Campaign

Christopher Greenwood
{"title":"The Applicability of International Humanitarian Law and the Law of Neutrality to the Kosovo Campaign","authors":"Christopher Greenwood","doi":"10.1163/9789004423152_006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he purpose of this paper1 is to examine the applicability of international humanitarian law and the law of neutrality to Operation Allied Force, the NATO campaign over Kosovo in 1999. The paper is thus chiefly about jus in bello (which is treated here as synonymous with the law of armed conflict and international humanitarian law), not about jus ad bellum. It is not intended, therefore, to enter into the controversy regarding the legality of the decision to resort to force over Kosovo or the long-running debate over whether contemporary international law recognizes a right of humanitarian intervention in the face of large scale violations of human rights. The present writer has already made clear in other publications his view that a right of humanitarian intervention (albeit one of a strictly limited character) exists in","PeriodicalId":433514,"journal":{"name":"Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 31 (2001)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 31 (2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004423152_006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

he purpose of this paper1 is to examine the applicability of international humanitarian law and the law of neutrality to Operation Allied Force, the NATO campaign over Kosovo in 1999. The paper is thus chiefly about jus in bello (which is treated here as synonymous with the law of armed conflict and international humanitarian law), not about jus ad bellum. It is not intended, therefore, to enter into the controversy regarding the legality of the decision to resort to force over Kosovo or the long-running debate over whether contemporary international law recognizes a right of humanitarian intervention in the face of large scale violations of human rights. The present writer has already made clear in other publications his view that a right of humanitarian intervention (albeit one of a strictly limited character) exists in
国际人道主义法和中立法对科索沃战役的适用性
本文的目的是考察国际人道主义法和中立法在1999年北约对科索沃的军事行动“盟军行动”中的适用性。因此,这篇论文主要是关于战时法(在这里被视为武装冲突法和国际人道主义法的同义词),而不是关于战时法。因此,本文不打算讨论关于在科索沃问题上使用武力的决定是否合法的争论,也不打算讨论关于当代国际法是否承认在大规模侵犯人权的情况下有进行人道主义干预的权利的长期辩论。本文作者已在其他出版物中明确表明他的观点,即人道主义干预的权利(尽管具有严格限制的性质)存在于
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信